Need I say more? George Bush should have never been president the first time and he got elected twice! Now the nation and the worl are paying the price, we have ourselves to blame. State of mind is me vote? for what? He's for what DUMMIES!
2007-09-27 10:07:34 · 6 answers · asked by John S 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
Don't hate the player hate the game.
2007-09-27 10:23:31 · answer #1 · answered by Greg 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The same question can be applied to the Dems, vote for the war (mistake), vote against funding the troops or equipment, (mistake) holler about supporting the troops then vote against funding them again (mistake), stand up and demand that Bush pull the troops out NOW then stand up and say, well I can't say that I'd have the troops home during the first term if elected (Four Years ya know)
And interestingly, Bush won the election with more than 50% of the vote both times (no mater how it was counted or recounted) something Bill never did.
2007-09-27 20:14:48 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
There is only 1 true anti-war candidate for president and that is Ron Paul, a Republican. All the other Republicans support the Iraq, Iran, and Sudan Wars. Hillary Clinton also backs all 3 (though she pretends to be against the War on Iraq). All other Democrats except Kucinich and Gravel support the proposed invasion and overthrow of the moderate Islamic Democracy in Iran, as well as Sudan. Kucinich and Gravel oppose Iraq and Iran, but support Sudan (which is referred to as "humanitarian intervention" instead of "war" and is backed by a group called the "Save Darfur Coalition").
Ron Paul says no to all of the destabilizing wars that the other candidates support (they don't call him "Dr. No" in the Beltway for nothing). He also wants to dump the IRS and Federal Reserve to prevent the government from having enough money to start more wars in the future.
If you want to stop this country from warmongering, ironically your only choice is a Republican from Texas, though he has very little else in common with the Big Government Warmongering "Conservative" in the White House.
2007-09-27 17:17:28 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
If it wasn't for George Bush, Saddam would be rising in power and setting up the next Fascist Gestapo right now.
George Bush is the answer to the question: "What would have happened if some stopped Hitler BEFORE he came into power?"
George Bush is PREVENTING WWIII.
2007-09-27 17:16:07 · answer #4 · answered by Philip H 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I HAD to vote for Bush because the other candidate was EVIL INCARNATE!!!!!!
Offer me an acceptable alternative, and I'll vote that way. So far, the EVIL woman and the INEXPERIENCED IDIOT are not doing it for me....
2007-09-27 17:15:35 · answer #5 · answered by DJ 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I can see that you are upset but what you describe could apply to either party.
2007-09-27 17:41:59 · answer #6 · answered by hdean45 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋