Look at the stellar record of any of the other candidates and she doesn't look all that much better or worse than the others.
One thing for sure she could never be as bad as the one in there now.
2007-09-27 11:30:29
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
6⤋
What we all need to remember is the President of the U.S. of A. is the leader of the free world. Like it or not that's the fact jack! With that in mind know that being the leader of the free world (U.S.ofA. as well as the Prez) that makes us a target for all wana-be somebody important crackpots. Having said all that we need to have a President with "crazy eyes", a cowboy(girl) a$$ kicker that the crackpots will know will blow their a$$ away! Obama, no way, weak backbone. He wants America to regress to a third class power. He would be worse than Jimmy C. Kerry? he has to much conscious and any hesitation would be seen as a sign of weakness. But Hilary? She has crazy eyes! She would be an a$$ kicker like Maggie Thatcher. Pity the first fool to f@ck with Hilary. She would without question blow their collectives a$$'s off the planet. And that is the mentality we need in our presidents. Say what you will about the republicans, the bottom line is that those "crazy cowboys" scare the crap out of crackpots, and fear is the only thing that keeps them at bay. What is happening in Iraq is a terrible thing, no doubt about it. This sound mean and cruel but think of it this way-- The next person to be blow up by a car bomb.. An Innocent Iraqi or you wife, brother, grandchild as they leave the mall? Keep the war over there where it belongs.
2007-09-27 19:01:18
·
answer #2
·
answered by RUDOLPH M 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Of course it's safe to conclude that she will make a terrible President. She has zero experience, has accomplished nothing as a senator except run for office, and dances around questions - refusing to answer. When running for reelection in the Senate she promised to bring the troops home from Iraq, which she has failed to do. Now she won't make any pledges whatsoever or even address the difficult issues......yet she wants to be President. What a joke!
2007-09-27 18:51:29
·
answer #3
·
answered by Bill 6
·
3⤊
2⤋
Hillary is basically just running to get Bill back in the house. You know it'll be basically like both of them together as president if she wins. We cannot have that, and have to vote Republican. She believes in big government and the government to take more of your freedoms away. I don't understand.
Alot of people hate Bush, and I don't know why. He's done so much for this country and so much progress has been accomplished in Iraq. If he could run again I would vote again.
If Hillary wins we are all doomed and what we know as the united states will be no more because she doesn't know what she's doing.
2007-09-27 19:33:06
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
No.
I lived in the NY area for a few years, and most New Yorkers, not just the city, thought she did a good job for the state.
Even in heavily Republican upstate NY, she was well thought of as a Senator.
However many of the same people who appreciated her work in the Senate, informed me that they would not vote Dem to get her in office.
They like her for the State, not the Country. Some party lines are too hard to cross.
2007-09-27 18:50:28
·
answer #5
·
answered by Think 1st 7
·
2⤊
1⤋
No. You must look much deeper to determine why you should not vote for Hillary or Obama. I suggest you read up on(it wont take long)-the Council of Foreign Relations, and look into who is a member and what their goals are(not as stated by them, but judged by their actions and their "research"). In particular, I recommend you look into books like "God and Gold"(how and why Western civilation should rule the entire world), and "The Anglo American Establishment"(why Anglo people are superior and "others" can only be ruled by an eventual one world government run by Anglo's with the highest of high incomes) written by Bill Clinton's mentor. Don't let the media(also members of the CFR-just check their website) distract you from the real issues that face you and yours.
2007-09-27 18:40:17
·
answer #6
·
answered by chicalinda 3
·
3⤊
2⤋
Sure, going on that assumption Bush never should have even been able to run right?
With no experience in the Senate and how many companies he led to chapter 11? Is it really any surprise what he has done to our deficit?
Just saying, I'd prefer someone who does nothing than someone who runs companies and countries into the ground.
2007-09-27 18:34:43
·
answer #7
·
answered by Devil's Advocette 5
·
2⤊
1⤋
it is safe to conclude that hillary will make a terrible president, but it's not because of her lack of accomplishments as a senator. it's because she's a socialist and her brain is messed up.
2007-09-27 19:00:45
·
answer #8
·
answered by White 5
·
1⤊
2⤋
I think it is always best to look at a candidate's career and not just a brief snapshot. That would be like looking at Einstein's last years and saying he was an idiot because he didn't produce anything as great as the theory of relativity. My favorite legislation is the 21st Century Nanotechnology Research and Development Act but that's probably because I am a Voyager geek. Would you like to be judge on a brief period of your life or your life as a whole?
2007-09-27 18:49:30
·
answer #9
·
answered by mudgei 2
·
1⤊
2⤋
She will pull us down the road to socialism. She'll start by trying for force 'free health care' down our throats. Some people still believe in Santa Clause and don't realize that the government can't give you anything for free. It will only take your freedom away.
2007-09-28 02:01:05
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Hillary has been our Senator for six years, and has yet to do anything of significance for our state. She promised, in her Senate campaigns, to fulfill her full terms as Senator, if elected. Kinda looks like she doesn't keep her word. Hillary, also, has NO leadership experience or skills.
2007-09-27 18:55:44
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋