how in the world is guliani the front runner for the nomination. here is a guy that is bush on steroids. arrogant , thoughtless, a tough talker who doesn't listen and can't get along with anyone. (ask his kids or 2 exwives about that).there are good republican choices such as mike huckabee or ron paul. why would you want more of the failed bush regime.
2007-09-27 06:02:38 · 8 answers · asked by doc_of_three 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
I agree, it should be McCain or Thompson.
On the other side, why are the Dems preparing to nominate a thoroughly unelectable candidate (again) in either Hillary or Obama when they have someone like Bill Richardson in the field who is much more likely to garner the moderate votes.
2007-09-27 06:11:02 · answer #1 · answered by thegubmint 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I think that whomever the Reupblican's choose as a front runner will continue to enforce the Immigration Reform we have going. I do agree that Iraq could have been handled a better way, but even from the mouths of the soliders that have come home it's not a lost cause. It's something they believe in as well, and work hard to help those people.
They are probably chosing Guliani because of the way he handled 911, and he would continue to do what it takes to protect our great nation. He will not want to talk to them first, allow them to kill more American citizens, and then finally decided that we need to go to war. However they will only decide this when they cut our Military spending in half and we don't have the funds, or soliders to help protect our nation.
As far as the Democratic nomination....how in the heck are they even considering Clinton?? She's not a good canidate for the job. I've lived in New Mexico for 7 years, and Bill Richardson has done a lot to help New Mexico. If there should be a front runner on the Democractic side it should be Richardson.
2007-09-27 06:51:46 · answer #2 · answered by alwyzn2somthn 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
While I disagree with your view on Bush.
I would also like to know how he is the front runner sorry but i want someone who is tough on illegal immigration and he isn't the man. I also wonder how anyone could vote for any of the Democrats being that none of them are tough on illegal immigration which affects us all in numerous way's the majority of people are sick and tired of flipping the bills for them and i just hope their votes will reflect this
2007-09-27 06:14:49 · answer #3 · answered by Wildroze 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
"Failed Bush Regime". True , the war in Iraq could have been handled better. I totally disagree with it being a failure.
You must have studied political science at Berkley because you have no clue as to what constitutes a "regime".
If Hillary is elected, will it be called the "Clinton Regime"?
2007-09-27 06:13:11 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
I'm not for Guliani, and I disagree with your analysis of the current administration.
2007-09-27 06:05:47 · answer #5 · answered by Mommymonster 7 · 4⤊ 0⤋
the same as hillary in a way, whitewater, lets her husband cheat, talks tough but sidesteps issues. both sides will have a better idea come nov, but right now it is week to week. i say thompson/mccain---clinto/richardson fight it out.
2007-09-27 06:10:18 · answer #6 · answered by BRYAN H 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I don't really care that he was a scum bag in the past, well I do, but what most concerns me are his positions on important items. He is too liberal and HE'S PRO-AMNESTY. That's why I won't vote for him.
2007-09-27 06:43:29 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I say it should be Mccain!
2007-09-27 06:24:47 · answer #8 · answered by <Carol> 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋