Hillary Rodham Clinton, chocolate milk vote?

Question

Her idea to give $5000 dollars to every new born, seems like the chocolate milk vote to me.
When I was in 3rd grade we had a vote for school president, and he promised us chocolate milk with our school lunch.
Sure we got our chocolate milk, but we had to pay the difference, it wasn't a free addition to our lunch.
Isn't she trying the same scam, just to get votes from the naive people?

And what if I don’t have kids, it won’t benefit me in anyway, it only takes more money away from me, wth is she thinking?

Answer 1

Its not the governments job to pay for your children! Period!
Do you have any idea how much of our tax money already goes toward this crap! Right now in Louisiana a woman can receive up to 300.00 to 400.00 a month in food stamps for 2 children and 200.00 more per each additional child!
So lets give them more reasons to have more children!!!!!
I cant believe that anyone would even consider voting for such an idiot!
She is not a supporter of the working American public!
Her goal is to make the American people totally rely on the government!

Answer 2

She is buying votes! Hitlery is a socialist witch that will say anything for a vote.

Why should I foot the bill for everyone else's kids? Parents should provide for their own children - BTW, I provided for my 4 children without help from Queen Hillary!

Answer 3

Hillary is just pandering for the votes of illegal aliens and welfare mothers, both of which have more kids than they can take care of. Taxpayers will revolt in paying for such a program. You can be sure the middle classes kids won't be included either. Just another Socialist program designed by Hillary.

Answer 4

thank you for the photograph, i think of that's probable the main unbecoming hairstyle that i've got ever seen on her. yet, specific, i could vote for her. i think of she's a lot extra qualified than our incumbent and could do a extra valuable interest. (of direction, I additionally think of my canines could do a extra valuable interest than George Dubya. She may be in simple terms a canines yet she knows ordinary words like take a seat, lie down and dance. i think of that's better than George Dubya knows... or a minimum of he has hassle announcing even ordinary words.) If the Democrats nominate her, i would be balloting for her.

Answer 5

This program will cost the tax payers over 200 billion dollars a year. Of course it's a scam to get the STUPID vote. Can you imagine the number of welfare mommies turning out more kids to get this money which will lead to just more welfare dollars added to the national budget. Add the cost of this program to her purposed national health care and we have an additional 500 billion dollars added to the budget in the 1st year alone. America...Get ready for the largest tax increase in history

Answer 6

I support her. I'd rather give the money to children than haliburton, or on a meaningless war.

"And what if I don’t have kids, it won’t benefit me in anyway, it only takes more money away from me, wth is she thinking?"
I think she wants to promote families. It's already hard enough to raise kids, especially if you're a single parent.

Edit: "This program will cost the tax payers over 200 billion dollars a year." So how far up your *** did you go to find that one?

Answer 7

Honestly, I think its a shitty idea. Only because there are so many crack whores and bad parents who will only have kids for the money.. then probably give the kid up for adoption or worse.

But I agree with Jacob.. the illegal immigrants will make bank off of that

Answer 8

i dont have little ones either and cant by choice but arent u tired of what has been going on? the republicans r putting us in debt right now so bad we will probably never recooperate.generations will be paying for all these mistakes their making right now.the working people in america cant even afford food right now.what is our president doing about it ? nothing. because he dont care.we have no health insurance.does he care? i think not he's not doing about it.he's only looking out for the top 1%.he is undoubtly the worst president we have had in my time.he started this nonsense war for what? oil ,which if u would check it out.osama s family lived on his farm in texas when this so called war started against osama.what did our president do.he put them all on plane and made sure they got out of the country.dick cheney the pres and osama were all business partners in oil before this happened. the truth known still are.he has come against the constitution in his own country.dan rather spoke out against him and what happened? he got fired. we need to step back and see where the real terrorist is.it's time for a woman as a president.other countries has had them for centuries. they prosper and stay out of wars.

Answer 9

I kind of agree with it.........since Bush is basically taking money away from newborns every time he runs up the national deficit. It's no scam, she just genuinely cares about the children's future, unlike the Republicans who feel they can get rich off borrowed money and leave the responsibility to the next generation(s) to pay the bill. Good for her......better to the children than more to this stupid, worthless war.

Edit -- So what if you don't have any children? What, do you think the Republicans are doing you any favors by ruining the economy everyday as we speak? Plus aren't you tired of paying $50 bucks to fill up your S.U.V.? Ha, the last guys answer where the government doesn't have to give you money for your children is great. But they sure do love taking it away for dumb things such as re-distributing it to the top 1% of America. Nice.

Answer 10

Just digging up the tried and true shenanigans. Think
you put your thumb on it (here's an ironic chuckle --
and a star for ye)
;0]