Obama, or Hillary. The terrorists want an American President who will surrender in Iraq and not focus on the war on terror.
2007-06-16 05:24:50
·
answer #1
·
answered by Sleeck 3
·
6⤊
2⤋
You provide us thrilling alternatives! i think of Hitler has already infiltrated the Republican occasion we call him GWB in this character. I understand your factor, and believe you, the real question right it fairly is are we going to proceed to allow the media to chosen our applicants or are WE going to do the choosing? Ron Paul & Dennis Kucinich have been the two applicants i replaced into maximum interested in and that they've been disregarded to dying via the media. Ron Paul nevertheless has assorted followers - i could choose for to work out a "revolution" and function human beings nevertheless vote for the candidate of their determination. i could gladly vote for a third occasion - according to hazard we, the individuals, could initiate our very own occasion and take our u . s . back from each and every of the "elites". What a ask your self which would be to them! the main annoying ingredient approximately those applicants is that neither will handle the Patriot Act, that's an excellent deal to me. i'm no longer a occasion voter, and that i choose for my shape back.
2016-10-17 11:26:17
·
answer #2
·
answered by balok 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Probably Rudy. Rudy seems to be pretty irresponsible when it comes to coming up with a foreign policy, and is easily vilified because of his personal actions.
"Look at the American President -he divorced his wife while she was being treated for cancer."
Rudy will be the best propaganda tool Al' Qaeda could hope for, and is less qualified to run a country than Bush so the mistakes Bush made will be exacerbated.
2007-06-16 05:29:38
·
answer #3
·
answered by Mr. Samsa 5
·
4⤊
1⤋
He wouldn't vote for any of them. He can't vote in the US. What a ridiculous question. I swear they are getting worse. Maybe it is because all the normal insults have been thrown and it is time for new ones or people are afraid to talk REAL issues.
2007-06-16 05:30:13
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
I think it would be Hilary...why because she is a woman. Not that I don't think that we shouldn't have a women president I would like one. I'm not sexist but Osama is. They don't think that women should have rights so I think she would be an easy target. Also Hilary would bring the troops back home which is exactly what he would want.
2007-06-16 17:31:16
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Rudy. He'd really make a great game out of the war on terror.
2007-06-16 05:26:05
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
Whoever is the Democrat nominee.... One only has to look at the terrorist press releases vs the Democrat press releases to notice that they are virtually identical, and that it is virtually impossible to discern which released which without knowing before reading them.
2007-06-16 05:39:44
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Ghouliania because he is Bush on steroids and will continue
the same policies as the Bushman.
2007-06-16 05:24:43
·
answer #8
·
answered by trichbopper 4
·
3⤊
1⤋
Definitely Hillary. She would take us "out of the war ASAP" Then he would be free to plan another attack! They be best friends.
2007-06-16 11:28:23
·
answer #9
·
answered by Carrie 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
Obama - most likely they have the same agenda!
2007-06-16 05:54:00
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋