Which ever candidate places doubt in the mind of the people that America should continue to pursue Alquida and the war on terror as is and as such.
This candidate will come out strongly about withdrawing from Iraq.
This candidate will suggest that the US engage in other means of fighting terrorism rather than punishing the nations that harbor or participate in terrorist training - this because you are punishing the people not the government.
This candidate will call for a limited withdrawal from Afghanistan and full withdrawal in 2-3 years
This candidate may also suggest that getting OBL will not end terrorism so this goal is faulty.
The candidate that calls for peace peace and no military actions against terrorist nations and only limited economic sanctions- this on the theory that trading partners do not war on each other.
I personally think he would vote for Obama because Obama has certain islmc schooling. The depth of this is truly unprobed by the press. No real cross referencing and comparison to islmc ideals and his choices in vote, speeches, or past. Also Obama has no time as an executive on any higher level.
2007-06-14 12:39:53
·
answer #1
·
answered by cordsoforion 5
·
1⤊
3⤋
Good one.
An Independent
Or whichever one would keep the fighting going.
There are those that are fascinated with war and death, then there are those that prefer peace. As the media has sold us bin-laden as a mad terrorist, sold us hussein as hitler and is now selling us the war of fear, we will buy the new 4wd suv that goes 0-60 in 7.8 secs.
It is said the Nero played a fiddle as Rome burned, we need a new fiddler to keep us entertained.
2007-06-14 12:41:39
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Usama Bin Laden would vote for Jimmy Carter.
2007-06-15 03:37:07
·
answer #3
·
answered by Michel 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Obama. He would've though he saw Osama and voted for it but ends up voting Obama.
2007-06-14 18:19:16
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Osama would vote for anybody who will keep the US in the Middle East. If we aren't there ticking off the people who live there, nobody would join his cause to remove us.
2007-06-14 13:18:41
·
answer #5
·
answered by AngelaTC 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
I think he would elect the presidential candidate that is looking to withdrawal the troops from Iraq and Afghanistan. If the troops leave these countries, Al-Qaeda and the Taliban could return to Afghanistan and Al-Qaeda and Iran could take over Iraq.
If Al-Qaeda and Iran take over Iraq, then Israel will be wiped off the map and the US will be in store for one of the biggest terrorist attacks in its history. An attack so great that it will bring down the US Government like a house of cards.
2007-06-14 12:36:06
·
answer #6
·
answered by beingsmartisrelative 4
·
2⤊
2⤋
hi. stable concept scary question... properly i might might desire to declare he might follow alongside with the elite of this united states of america, and because the two social gathering equipment develop into created to maintain "we the persons" divided and we at present have a Republican president, he might maximum honestly vote Democrat. regrettably "the widely used public" hasn't yet caught onto the certainty that social gathering does not remember all yet some politicians suck in spite of social gathering association.
2016-10-09 05:42:10
·
answer #7
·
answered by valderrama 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
He'd say "Bush (If he could run for a third term.). I'd like another four years of just relaxing my hideout while my men do my dirty work, he hasn't tried to get me for six years. And I'm just loving our new base in Iraq." "Praise Allah and Praise President Bush!"
2007-06-14 13:04:24
·
answer #8
·
answered by Liberals love America! 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
Nancy Pelosi!
2007-06-14 12:31:27
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
I bet he'd want George W back as president
2007-06-14 12:44:11
·
answer #10
·
answered by Alex L 4
·
3⤊
0⤋