English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Many people are discussing Hilary Clinton's run for presidency.If she does become president she'll be the first female president. Do you think that she should be president? Do you think she would be a good one? Lastly, do you think people will only vote for her so we can finally have a female president?

2007-06-13 13:18:35 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Elections

20 answers

I would love to see Hillary as President.



Hillary is what America needs. She's what America needs right now. Bush has turned us against each other and the rest of the world. We need someone who'll get us back on track and who'll show the rest of the world that it wasn't America; it was Bush.

Most people, though, will argue, saying stuff like, "Well... if she gets it, that means two families will have been in charge for the past 24 years". Look... I'd rather live with a Clinton as President for the rest of my life than to have another Conservative like Bush in the White House.


So, yes. I think Hillary Clinton will get it in 2008, and I think she'll do a phenomenal job.

2007-06-13 13:28:52 · answer #1 · answered by Jeremiah 5 · 3 12

"Many of you are well enough off that ... the tax cuts may have helped you. We're saying that for America to get back on track, we're probably going to cut that short and not give it to you. We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." (Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton - June 28, 2004, in San Francisco at a Democrat Party fundraiser)

"I want to take those profits and put them into an alternative energy fund that will begin to fund alternative smart energy alternatives that will actually begin to move us toward the direction of independence." (Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton - February 2, 2007, at DNC Winter Meeting - regarding profits earned by oil companies, which are not [yet] owned by the government)

"As president I know I can't kill, jail or occupy every nation we don't agree with and I cannot just wish that all the terrorists be wiped off the face of the Earth" (Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton - February 10, 2007, at a campaign appearance in New Hampshire)

"We're going to change the way we finance the system by taking away money from people who are doing well now" — (Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton — March 24, 2007, at a health care forum in Las Vegas)

2007-06-13 22:07:22 · answer #2 · answered by and socialism 4 · 3 2

I look forward to Bill Clinton's return to the White House even if Hillary has the key to the front door!

2007-06-14 08:25:05 · answer #3 · answered by pecker_head_bill 4 · 1 0

Yes, I do and she has my vote. She's qualified, brilliant and has great ideas for this country. I like her plan on Iraq, her plan to form a coalition with our Allies to fight terrorism all over the globe, her plan to leave residual troops in Iraq and Afghanistan to deal with Al Queda, her determination to do something about our health care system, and her dedication to finding alternative fuel sources.

I think some people will vote for her strictly because she's a woman but I hope that most people will use their vote more responsibly than that. For me, it's a bonus that she's a woman, and I would be thrilled at the shattering of that glass ceiling, but I would never vote for her if I didn't believe she was the best candidate out there.

EDIT: Here's the debunking link for that ridiculous Black Panther story "wingshooter" leaves everywhere.

http://www.snopes.com/politics/clintons/panthers.asp

2007-06-13 22:56:29 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

She should not be president. She is a sociopath. She will do or say anything to anyone to get what she wants. She would be the worst President in US history as well as the worst person to be president. Some people will vote for her only because she is a woman. That's a terrible reason to vote for a candidate, but is probably the ONLY reason to vote for Hildabeast.

2007-06-13 22:52:45 · answer #5 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 2 2

Most political strategists won't come out and say it, but they know it is true. The fact is that Hilary won't even get the nomination. I bet John Edwards will. Edwards is polling well in IA, NV, NH, and SC. If he pulls of IA, he can use that momentum to swing over in NH and NV. Edwards is going for the Big Mo' strategy meaning that he hopes to knock out a few first states and then use the momentum to swing him in the white house. (or at least the nomination) The second thing is that you need to ignore national polls in the primaries. Before John Kerry won in IA in 2004, Dean was dominating the national polls, after wards he wasn't even in them. (of course the Dean Scream was also a factor) But my point is that whoever knocks out a few big states, wins. And ABM is taking votes away from Hilary in the north, Edwards in the south. Whoever wins some of the first primaries and caucuses wins. And as of now, that is John Edwards

2007-06-13 21:02:34 · answer #6 · answered by juidiookaymya 1 · 3 2

As far as I am concerned there is only one woman qualified to become President of the United States and that woman is Condolezza Rice. So do I think Hilary should be president, not just no but HELL NO!. NO, I DO NOT THINK SHE WOULD BE A GOOD PRESIDENT. And lastly, if the only reason you would vote for her is so we can have a female president than you are voting for all the wrong reasons. Try evaluating the candidates and picking one with whom you agree on most things.

2007-06-13 20:29:10 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 9 4

I think Hillary will a make great president despite the fact that she is a woman. It is about time the USA caught up with the rest of the world. Pelosi has too much power as it is and I do not think she wants to relinqish the position she has now. Condelezza would make a terrible president. For starters we will never get our troops out of Iraq, given that she is Bush-A-- kisser. (Sorry for the generalization)

In regards to statement that someome said about her being president for two terms that was under a Republican controlled Congress for 6 years, so we were not able to see how effective she really is.

2007-06-13 21:50:13 · answer #8 · answered by Michael M 6 · 2 5

Yes Hillary should be President another white male in the White House is the last thing America needs. The jig is up, America is voting very carefully this election.

She is intelligent, qualified, well known by world leaders, outstanding in the Senate and as First Lady she was well connected.

We have to end this madness, this is not what our country is based on, we elected President Bush to lead us, he failed miserably. God only knows how much deeper he will drag us before another can take over

When that person takes over we had better know they can do the job even if it;s not Hillary.

2007-06-13 21:47:49 · answer #9 · answered by GO HILLARY 7 · 1 6

I think she would be a horrible President, because her ideology is definitively Socialist which is a step away from Communist. I FEAR that there are those who will vote for her JUST because she's female.

The only women that I would consider voting for are Condi Rice & myself.

With regard to the comments about taxes, you should have her define "wealthy" for you, because usually when the "wealthy" are taxed more, it usually begins with those making around $30,000 a year.

2007-06-13 23:18:32 · answer #10 · answered by SusanB 5 · 1 3

Shoot me first ...PLEASE!


Conveniently Forgotten Facts. -- Back in 1969 a group of Black Panthers
decided that a fellow black panther named Alex Rackley needed to die.

Rackley was suspected of disloyalty. Rackley was first tied to a chair.
Once safely immobilized, his friends tortured him for hours by, among
other things, pouring boiling water on him. When they got tired of torturing
Rackley, Black Panther member, Warren Kimbo took Rackley outside and put
a bullet in his head. Rackley's body was later found floating in a river
about 25 miles north of New Haven Connecticut.

Perhaps at this point you're curious as to what happened to these Black
Panthers? In 1977, that's only eight years later, only one of the
Killers was still in jail. The shooter,Warren Kimbro, managed to get a
scholarship to Harvard and became good friends with none other than Al Gore. He
later became an assistant dean at an eastern Connecticut State College. Isn't
that something? As a '60s radical you can pump a bullet into someone's
head and a few years later, in the same state, you can become an assistant
College dean! Only in America !

Erica Huggins was the woman who served the Panthers by boiling the water
for Mr. Rackley's torture. Some years later Ms. Huggins was elected to a
California School Board.

How in the world do you think these killers got off so easy? Maybe it
was in some part due to the efforts of two people who came to the defense of
the Panthers. These two people actually went so far as to shut down Yale
University with demonstrations in defense of the accused Black Panthers
during their trial. One of these people was none other than Bill Lan
Lee.

Mr. Lee, or Mr. Lan Lee, as the case may be, isn't a college dean. He is
not a member of a California School Board. He is now head of the United
States Justice Department's Civil Rights Division, appointed by none
other than Bill Clinton.

O.K., so who was the other Panther defender? Is this other notable
Panther defender now a school board member? Is this other Panther apologist now
an assistant college dean? No, neither!

The other Panther defender was, like Lee, a radical law student at Yale
University at the time. She is now known as the "smartest woman in the
world." She is none other than the Democratic Senator from the state of
New York ----our former First Lady, the incredible Hillary Rodham
Clinton .

2007-06-13 20:23:06 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 9 4

fedest.com, questions and answers