English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Elections - September 2006

[Selected]: All categories Politics & Government Elections

2006-09-27 01:01:12 · 5 answers · asked by distalbicept 3

IF you had to chose one of the above, which one would it be (and why) to face all the USA had faced in the past (2) presidental terms?

2006-09-27 00:49:45 · 17 answers · asked by distalbicept 3

"90% of our votes were counted by only THREE major corperations in 2004.
Are these systems secure?
Well "the hardware, "secret"; the software, "secret"; what's the cryptography? Can't tell you because that'll compromise the secrecy of the machine; Federal testing procedures, "secret"; results of the test, "secret"." -Dr. David Dill Professor of Computer Sciences at Stansford University

(listen to DarylBradfordSmith_Jim_Condit14Aug2006.mp3 )

2006-09-26 18:32:10 · 5 answers · asked by sincere12_26 4

Or will the Turd for brain Democrats try to keep a legal candidate off the ballot again....they always do this crap...how can you people vote for these bums?

2006-09-26 17:52:06 · 7 answers · asked by loofa36 6

2006-09-26 15:22:58 · 22 answers · asked by Anonymous

This week, Robert F. Kennedy has another article out about our election process -- before you reply, please read it. If you have different information that refutes his article, please share it in your response.

http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/story/11717105/robert_f_kennedy_jr__will_the_next_election_be_hacked/1

It is one thing to say that "all elections are crooked" and that "both sides have their ways to do this" and another to accept this as reality to our election system.

NO side should be able to manipulate elections and that is what we should be concerned about. So, will the next election be hacked?

2006-09-26 14:51:43 · 7 answers · asked by kaliselenite 3

today I found out that the general elections for my area are going to be held at a church.Elections should not be held in a church , period. I thought that this was violating some seperation of church and state law. But apparently I dont even understand the basic constitution. I am really trying to learn more about government but it is hard. when I did research on the people runnning, I cant find much. Only on people already in office.Why should I vote.?

2006-09-26 14:20:42 · 19 answers · asked by Pussycat 4

Hilliary? Think about it.

2006-09-26 11:46:08 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-09-26 11:41:37 · 4 answers · asked by Elizabeth S 3

If there are any presidents that have done this could someone list them please, I cant find any evidence of this but it sounds familiar.

2006-09-26 11:30:24 · 6 answers · asked by Redwine 2

2006-09-26 10:14:49 · 14 answers · asked by mellencat 1

I,am not sure of this info. which I heard from a friend, but he told me that Marilyn Monroe was preparing for a U.S Elections for herself, using all the sources and "contacts" of the late JFK !!!
But death got to her first. Is that true ??

2006-09-26 09:49:38 · 6 answers · asked by Fadi 2

does seperation of church and state not count here?

2006-09-26 08:44:16 · 11 answers · asked by Pussycat 4

2006-09-26 08:26:46 · 3 answers · asked by ladydi 2

I live in a Christain community apartment building. Recently we had a man set up a resident association. He has recently retired and now the president has ONLY the people who can come to the meetings vote. Our apartment is filled with handicapped and a few elderly people that have a hard time getting down to the meeting. Is this fair? I live in America, I thought, but now I'm finding that I won't get to vote this night because I need to go to a class on computers. They had only a third of the people at the last meeting that voted against my suggestion that we have an absentee ballod.
I have lived in this building for nineteen years. When I first moved there we all got to vote for a 'house committee' by a ballod left under our door. These were three or four residents who held the key to the office that housed everyone's door keys. They would help us get into our apartments. They had no real power. It seems that power is going to these new officer's heads--what do you think?

2006-09-26 08:23:17 · 3 answers · asked by Elizabeth S 3

I am tired of being the youngest person at the poles, on election day," I'm 49". The torch of freedom must be carried by the young. The young people of this country must understand, " there's no eazy way to be free". When I go to vote I see all of these elderly ladies in wheel chairs, with oxygen bottles. They have to have someone drive them to the poles. I always let them ahead of me in line, because even going out at all is a hardship for them. If people who are so old that even leaving their homes is such a struggle, why can't young people show up and vote? The political partys are not even going to bother to put anyone on the ticket, who might do something to help make this country great again, for every one, not just the rich! The political parties on both sides have learned that the old people will vote for anybody who cliams to be a Christian, even if that person will work agents the interest of the elderly. What would it take to wake the young people of America up?

2006-09-26 07:26:05 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-09-26 07:12:24 · 3 answers · asked by jwm565 1

In 2004, there was media buzz about the idea of Republican Senator John McCain of Arizona being considered for the Democratic Vice-Presidential nomination. McCain quickly dispelled the notion, stating that he was supporting President Bush. However, what if the fantastic had happened with him accepting the number-two spot in Senator Kerry's campaign if it had been offered to him?

For Kerry supporters, would you have been less likely to support a bipartisan ticket, more likely, or the same? For Bush supporters, would a McCain defection cause you to reconsider supporting Bush? What I would like is some rationale behind whatever position that you would have on this question. Thanks in advance.

2006-09-26 06:35:33 · 4 answers · asked by Ѕємι~Мαđ ŠçїєŋŧιѕТ 6

Im 26 and I've been voting for the presidental election twice ever since i am allowed to vote. I live in California and what i've noticed is that the votes for big states doesnt really count because of the Electoral votes for the small states. If a president can win the Popular vote but still lose the election, why should i even bother voting when the vote for my states doesnt count? Even if my state voted for some guy, it doesnt really matter does it? New York and California are the most irrelevant states in terms of voting purposes i have ever seen just because most american live in those states. Voting is great if you get your voice heard but the past two presidentual elections, it seems like the election is fixed. And if the Pupular vote doesnt count, why have it.

2006-09-26 04:27:20 · 8 answers · asked by epicwolf 4

Tony Blair
George Bush
Al bundy
Hilary Clinton
Rambo
Ségolène Royal
Mr Bean
Ice T
Nicolas Sarkozy
Winston Churchill

2006-09-26 03:43:23 · 23 answers · asked by Dave 5

George Bush
Al bundy
Hilary Clinton
Rambo
Ségolène Royal
Mr Bean
Ice T
Nicolas Sarkozy

2006-09-26 03:40:40 · 4 answers · asked by Dave 5

I want to know more about their views on issues...not just what they say on the commericals!!! Thanks! :)~

2006-09-26 03:38:14 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-09-26 01:01:36 · 7 answers · asked by hakeem khursheed q 1

You must choose from the available known options. You cannot have a prime minister of the country that nobody has ever heard of before, as it would be unconstitutional.

2006-09-26 01:01:18 · 24 answers · asked by James 6

The whole Repubs vs. Dems issue is getting way out of control...

There are libs and conservies on both sides.

What is your tie breaker?

2006-09-25 21:28:29 · 17 answers · asked by rabble rouser 6

what do you think the criteria for choosing the next secretary general of the U.N. should be?

in other words, what qualifications should the next SG have?

2006-09-25 20:22:32 · 5 answers · asked by red 2

Richard (Kinky) Friedman is one of five candidates running for governor in Texas. His main opponent is incumbent Governor Rick Perry, but he also has a Democrat, Chris Bell, another Independent, Carol Keeton Strayhorn, and a Libertarian whose name I can't remember. (Guess he doesn't have much of a chance.) If you vote in Texas, who gets your vote and why?

2006-09-25 20:19:35 · 4 answers · asked by Warren D 7

2006-09-25 17:48:22 · 1 answers · asked by cynthia w 1

fedest.com, questions and answers