English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Elections - September 2006

[Selected]: All categories Politics & Government Elections

2006-09-28 05:20:43 · 4 answers · asked by jennifer 2

I am a democrat but I would consider him.

2006-09-28 05:02:56 · 4 answers · asked by bjmarchini 2

I'm talking about real elections, not American Idol.

2006-09-28 04:20:24 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-09-28 04:14:27 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

Will you vote for (D)Jim Doyle or (R)Mark Green
for govener?

2006-09-28 03:32:09 · 2 answers · asked by J.D 1

2006-09-28 03:15:20 · 13 answers · asked by costellos_creation 2

There was a lot of hue and cry when the congress chose its PM. Sonia Gandhi has dual citizenship. Do you think it should be decided outrightly?

2006-09-28 01:44:16 · 2 answers · asked by trimuph 3

2006-09-27 20:50:02 · 24 answers · asked by Anonymous

if not go to this site and register


http://election.dos.state.fl.us/regtovote/regform.shtml

2006-09-27 19:24:57 · 1 answers · asked by dharmabear 3

2006-09-27 19:10:33 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous

WHAT TYPE OF ELECTORAL SYSYTEM DO THEY HAVE

2006-09-27 18:55:46 · 1 answers · asked by Blaise F 1

2006-09-27 18:23:10 · 10 answers · asked by ENRIQUE L 1

It's chicken or egg question, perhaps - but before we stoop to temptation, don't we have to be a little bent?

2006-09-27 17:37:44 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-09-27 13:54:18 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

The table on the site listed below seems to show 'evidence' that people who voted Republican have a lower IQ than those who voted Democrat. Can this 'conclusion' be justified?

Does it matter?

http://www-unix.oit.umass.edu/~gcharter/iq.txt

2006-09-27 13:23:40 · 19 answers · asked by footynutguy 4

None of the people in Government have lost friends and family to war or AIDS or poverty or hunger... they could not possibly know what they are defending.

2006-09-27 12:02:02 · 8 answers · asked by rabble rouser 6

2006-09-27 10:11:23 · 4 answers · asked by little brother 1

Which is better? I believe both organizations have ballot initiatives this year. If Smoke Less Ohio passes then all of unconstitutional those municipal and county building smoking bans will be overturned.

2006-09-27 10:04:12 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

We blame Clinton , we don't like Bush , we ...we ..etc !!
Ok , what if we got the chance to name people for the next election ! who's yours ?

2006-09-27 09:35:37 · 19 answers · asked by citizen high 6

why do americans say they hate president Bush and put him down and all that jazz and still vote for him im confused

2006-09-27 08:50:38 · 12 answers · asked by periwinkle123 2

That's amazing! He got elected and no one voted for him. No one wants to admit they voted for the worst President in history.

2006-09-27 08:40:17 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-09-27 08:04:23 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

If these two were to run for president, who would you vote for and why?

2006-09-27 07:11:29 · 18 answers · asked by Blk Angel 2

2006-09-27 06:05:24 · 7 answers · asked by Forbes 3

Today, I lurned that Hillary Clinton is a communist. Tell everyone in New YourK not to vote fer her because she will become dictator and is full of pure liberal evilnessness.

2006-09-27 05:54:10 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous

I think she stands a chance in both

2006-09-27 05:06:37 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

To that end I would like to put out a possible alternative. Incumbents may not campaign. No commercials, no road trips. An incumbent's record will speak for a job well or poorly done.

Opposing candidates may not include any reference about the incumbent or other candidates in their platforms or commercial messages, unless the content of that message has been approved by the person it is about.

The possible result: Candidates are forced to restrict their campaigns to the issues and incumbents will not spend their time, that we pay for, away from the job we elected them to do.

I think debates along the way, between the incumbents and candidates would serve two purposes: allow the incumbents to voice themselves, and with precious few opportunities to do so, the issues, exclusively and to the public's benefit, would be addressed.

The public might even want to pay closer attention. Maybe even care again.

Imagine a campagin based on the issues alone?

What do you think?

2006-09-27 04:54:03 · 1 answers · asked by Liligirl 6

Democrats seem to be for bigger government, larger taxes, and less citizen rights. Why do they get votes?

2006-09-27 03:40:36 · 21 answers · asked by noybw 2

fedest.com, questions and answers