English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

14 answers

yeh, they had one in 2004. What makes you think that they wont have one now?

2006-09-26 10:15:37 · answer #1 · answered by The Raging Monkey 5 · 4 0

Of course. does the Civil War, The War of 1812, The spanish American War, WWI. WWII, Korean War, Viet Nam War, "The War on Terrorism", ETC., sound vaguely familiar? Presidential elections are a war in and of themselves.

2006-09-26 10:25:49 · answer #2 · answered by Brite Tiger 6 · 4 0

it did in 2004

2006-09-26 13:44:23 · answer #3 · answered by jimmy a 3 · 3 0

Yes of course, it would be dangerous not to, or a unpopular president could just delare war to stay in power. During the American Civil War Lincoln had to run against his former General McClellan who was running on a peace platform(This doesn't mean I support our current president ). During WW2 Roosevelt had to run as well.

2006-09-26 11:56:22 · answer #4 · answered by Lambchop08 3 · 3 0

It did in 1944, 1952, 1964, 1968 and 1972 (WWI occured between the elections)

2006-09-26 10:17:06 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 6 0

Sure, we did in 2004. We did in 1972 during Vietnam. We did in 1944 during WW2.

2006-09-26 14:23:17 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

Are you a moron?

Yes, it can, and it has. Look at the Viet Nam war in the 60s/70s - three Presidents (Nixon, Johnson, Kennedy). Korea - Truman and Eisenhower, etc.

2006-09-26 10:16:41 · answer #7 · answered by gatesfam@swbell.net 4 · 5 0

of course. wasn't WWII going on when Roosevelt got re-elected? I might be wrong about that, but yes we can have elections.

2006-09-26 10:16:10 · answer #8 · answered by advicemom 4 · 5 0

OF COURSE. LAST DONE IN 2004.

2006-09-30 07:15:47 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Lower the cost of a gallon of gas. Then find a centrist republican to run for the office.

2006-09-26 10:17:03 · answer #10 · answered by TarKettle 6 · 0 3

fedest.com, questions and answers