yeh, they had one in 2004. What makes you think that they wont have one now?
2006-09-26 10:15:37
·
answer #1
·
answered by The Raging Monkey 5
·
4⤊
0⤋
Of course. does the Civil War, The War of 1812, The spanish American War, WWI. WWII, Korean War, Viet Nam War, "The War on Terrorism", ETC., sound vaguely familiar? Presidential elections are a war in and of themselves.
2006-09-26 10:25:49
·
answer #2
·
answered by Brite Tiger 6
·
4⤊
0⤋
it did in 2004
2006-09-26 13:44:23
·
answer #3
·
answered by jimmy a 3
·
3⤊
0⤋
Yes of course, it would be dangerous not to, or a unpopular president could just delare war to stay in power. During the American Civil War Lincoln had to run against his former General McClellan who was running on a peace platform(This doesn't mean I support our current president ). During WW2 Roosevelt had to run as well.
2006-09-26 11:56:22
·
answer #4
·
answered by Lambchop08 3
·
3⤊
0⤋
It did in 1944, 1952, 1964, 1968 and 1972 (WWI occured between the elections)
2006-09-26 10:17:06
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
6⤊
0⤋
Sure, we did in 2004. We did in 1972 during Vietnam. We did in 1944 during WW2.
2006-09-26 14:23:17
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Are you a moron?
Yes, it can, and it has. Look at the Viet Nam war in the 60s/70s - three Presidents (Nixon, Johnson, Kennedy). Korea - Truman and Eisenhower, etc.
2006-09-26 10:16:41
·
answer #7
·
answered by gatesfam@swbell.net 4
·
5⤊
0⤋
of course. wasn't WWII going on when Roosevelt got re-elected? I might be wrong about that, but yes we can have elections.
2006-09-26 10:16:10
·
answer #8
·
answered by advicemom 4
·
5⤊
0⤋
OF COURSE. LAST DONE IN 2004.
2006-09-30 07:15:47
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Lower the cost of a gallon of gas. Then find a centrist republican to run for the office.
2006-09-26 10:17:03
·
answer #10
·
answered by TarKettle 6
·
0⤊
3⤋