Yes -- a very controversial question. We all know republicans spew propaganda today about how Bill Clinton was so passive against Saddam Husein. Democrats, in the same tone, defend him, saying Saddam was never much of a threat.
I was thinking about this the other day. If good old Bill would have been a little more proactive with Saddam, perhaps there would have been a chain reaction. Perhaps Al Queda would have reconsidered their tact. Perhaps September 11th would have never happened.
What do you all think? I know this is a sensitive subject, and I'm open to your bashing.
2007-09-12
15:06:06
·
29 answers
·
asked by
nintyfb01
2
in
Politics