Politics & Government - 25 July 2007

If Anyone thinks Bushe and his Organization who Now CONTROL All Positions of POWER, You need to WAKE T F UP. These SCUMBAGS are in NO WAY going to Relinquish Their StrangleHold on America. Folks, THEY Have DONE IT. We Americans are Screwed!! in the Video Link below FF(go to) 1:05min. on tapeCounter. Hitler&Bushe Sr. BOTH spoke of NewWorldOrder) BushesNaziFascist Regime is HERE To STAY !! They have CONTROL of U.S. Mass Media,ALL OWNED by ZIONISTjews, same ZIONISTS-CONTROL, PNAC, CRF, AIPAC, FdrlRsrve, International Banking, U.S. Military, PEOPLE !! WAKE T F UP!! The PARTY(America) IS OVER !! ONLY Hope is IMPEACH Cheney No Later than ... ..than,.. .. IMMEDIATELY !! This Link-Video is a MUST SEE !! FastForward to the 6:00 minute mark... http://www.911stuff.com/play-4411-Illuminati_9_11.html

2007-07-25 21:38:33 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Other - Politics & Government

Charge is considered class 4 misdemeanor and subject to $97 fine if convicted/plead guilty
Was outside my house in driveway/on sidewalk (maintained and owned by community HOA)
Refused to go inside when asked by officers
Did not have wallet/ID on me
Incorrect spelling of name, and wrong address on arrrest record (though gave correct SS# when asked)
NO WITNESSES besides cops
No past criminal record
Live in Fairfax Co. (Northern, VA)

Possibly irrelevant details:
Was held for five hours
Not tested by breathalizer, or other methods (not required for intoxication charge)
Officer refused to show how to make call after leaving numbers out of form to dial (refused phone call even after specifically asking while being booked)
Generally outstanding member of community-over 3k hours of voluntary community service (continues weekly), past Army officer, non-profit leader, landlord w/ no complaints and over 20 past tenants, member of local church group, etc
Thank-you for answering

2007-07-25 21:36:22 · 4 answers · asked by gulfstreamxo 1 in Law & Ethics

last year i lent my xgirlfriend $800.00 to buy a pug puppy. She bought the dog and registered it in her name. In april we broke up and i ended up taking the puppy with me. She to make a long story short abandoned the dog. I had no other choice but to take the puppy for the dogs safety. In may my x sent me a txt message saying she wants the dog back. I said no! Here it is july and no this moron called the cops and said i stole her dog. Granted i paid for the dog. The police did nothing for her. I want the akc papers in my name for this puppy as i have had her for months took care of her and paid all the vett bills etc. I sent my x a registered letter and she replied i will never sign my dog over. The thing is my x is now a drunk and druggy, cant realy give her the puppy back. Any advice. Should i sue her in small claims court for the akc rights??? And does anyone know who can help me find dog laws in pennsylvania as i can not immagine she has a right to this dog...thanks

2007-07-25 21:22:52 · 1 answers · asked by Anonymous in Law & Ethics

When lard-*** was First Lady, I sent her a 235-page report on the death and mistreatment of a patient fraudulently diagnosed and treated for cancer and murdered to cover it up. This was a clear cut case of Medicare fraud and murder.

Hillary sent the report back to me, with a letter stating she would not involve herself in such matters.

2007-07-25 21:08:59 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Elections

please tell me the any candidate should passed in 1st attempt ?or those also can try this exams which candidate paasing exam in 2 nd attempt?If any like this condition is their so please let me know.please send me answers as soon as possible.In both MPSC and UPSC examinations any this kind of condition is required that candidate must passed in 1 st attempt itself?

2007-07-25 21:07:56 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous in Law Enforcement & Police

don't they know when they've worn out their welcome? (not that they were ever welcome). you'd think they'd get the hint...are they only willing to listen to gunshots?

2007-07-25 21:06:57 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Immigration

Why has the New York City Department of Education decided to open an Islamist public school whose curriculum shares the same ideology as the September 11 terrorists? Six years after the attacks and still no memorial at Ground Zero, instead 2007 will see the opening of the taxpayer funded Brooklyn based madrassah aka "The Khalil Gibran International Academy for Arabic and Islamic Culture." Slated to be the school's principal, Dhabah [aka "Debbie"] Almontaser was presented an award by the Council on American Islamic Relations [CAIR, the Saudi funded front group for Hamas and a co-defendant in a 9/11 terrorism lawsuit] and more importantly, the curriculum of her school has been designed by the radical American Arab Anti Discrimination Committee [ADC].

Whatever happened to the seperation of church and state? How can we be funding a specifically religious school with government funds? Especially a school that will be run by Hamas sympathizers?

2007-07-25 21:04:59 · 8 answers · asked by Heather 5 in Other - Politics & Government

2007-07-25 21:03:55 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Immigration

And how he ended up dead?

2007-07-25 21:03:45 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Elections

and yep some info may have been wrong, but we got rid of a ruthless dictator, my heart bleeds haha! but now what?!
I want to support the troops and this great nation. I agree and blasting the crap outta some slimeball thugs but my prez says stay the course. But even I as a conservative republican, who isnt the slightest bit libturd, wonders what is the course? GW wont spell it out for me. I just wanna know when and what is the victory? I am not sure if trying to make them have our form of govt is the total answer. I like a view ive heard about separiting into three states like here and letting the kurds and shiites and sunnis live in each one. let them defend themselves against militants. we have trained them for over 2 years to do this!
I support our troops with all I got I am prior service too I support our prez though i may not always agree, but I just wanted to know what is the course?

2007-07-25 20:54:38 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Other - Politics & Government

ok this is how it goes i am 14 years old and am black. I got caught shoplifting from a target today, the worst part is this is my 3rd time stealing from there and they have all 3 times on tape. I take about $300 worth of dvd's everytime and everytime i go into the bathroom and wrap the dvd's in aluminium foil so the alarm doesn't go off ( the alarm doesn't go off). Well just like usual i started walking towards the bathroom and the Targert secuirty arrested me right thier on the spot, they took me to a room and showed me the videos of me stealing and took all my information, the guys there told me i was going to jail but my dad talked with the cop and the cop let me go home but i have courtdate comming up soon, what is going to happen to me? They can prove that i have stolen 2 out of 3 times but the last time i haddent walked out the store but i did pash the cash registers, so should i plead guilty on the first 2 and not guilty on the 3rd charge?, overall though what will happen to me?

2007-07-25 20:47:13 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Law & Ethics

2007-07-25 20:43:08 · 1 answers · asked by Anonymous in Law & Ethics

I've bought a dish tv on 17-7-07,paid the whole amount of 3k.I still have'nt recieved a single channel.The Dish tv employees came to my home and installed after 3 days and took an additional amount of Rs.1300 from me as installation charges.I have'nt recieved a single channel till date(26-7-07).
The problem the customer care says is the product is registered on the shop keepers name and they are trying to reregister it to my name.Can any one suggest me can i take this issue to the consumer court and how can i do this...?

2007-07-25 20:39:09 · 6 answers · asked by ferrari 2 in Law & Ethics

2007-07-25 20:38:34 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

2007-07-25 20:33:27 · 5 answers · asked by Eris Discordia 2 in Other - Politics & Government

2007-07-25 20:33:15 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Elections

2007-07-25 20:31:00 · 4 answers · asked by Liz M 2 in Military

2007-07-25 20:29:02 · 2 answers · asked by rahul01cute 1 in Immigration

I therefore certainly don’t think the West is locked into Jihad with Islam, though I suppose if the fundamentalists go too far they’ll have to be opposed. Iran’s comments about the “Great Satan” were aimed mostly at the United States: they were not made because the West was Christian. I think the West should try to overcome these strains between different religious groups. I do, however, think that the US is following a very dangerous policy in relation to the Middle East. The root of this trouble is that the US gives too much support to Israel. They allow them to have nuclear weapons and to do all sorts of things, some of which are contrary even to Jewish law. Jewish families occupy Arab houses without payment. That is stealing. I think that the US should be much firmer with Israel and put a lot of pressure on them, though this is difficult because of the strong Jewish lobby. Unless something is done there’ll be dangerous conflict in the Middle East. Such danger would be less likely to arise if all three Abrahamic faiths - Jews, Christians and Muslims - paid greater respect to what God teaches us about living together

2007-07-25 20:29:00 · 8 answers · asked by thebestbotintexas 2 in Politics

2007-07-25 20:25:36 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Government

Hillary won her senate seat by such a wide margin only because she ran against a last-minute subsititute for Rudy Giuliana, who was driven from the race by personal scandal. Babara Boxer of California is 100 times the Senator Hillary could ever hope to be. There are many other very qualified women out there. Why is Hillary even running?

2007-07-25 20:23:54 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Elections

we went to the court house and they said that they could not get them for us because the court reporter has passed away. the case is from the early 90's. i can't believe that there is no one else in the world that can transcribe those pages.

2007-07-25 20:21:19 · 3 answers · asked by gabbied 2 in Law & Ethics

any connections to IMF, ADB, DBM, DOF by GOCCs

2007-07-25 20:18:33 · 1 answers · asked by euge 1 in Government

2007-07-25 20:15:59 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Government

2007-07-25 20:07:26 · 2 answers · asked by Anonymous in Other - Politics & Government

Like stated above does anyone know when Hilarys coming to the valley (Arizona) for anything probley campaign issues thanks really would help :)

2007-07-25 19:58:39 · 4 answers · asked by Shaun 5 in Elections

oh please, i hope i get some knuckleheads who want to argue against global warming and claim that it's just a left-wing fear tactic and propaganda. yeah, the earth is actually entering an ice age....yeah, yeah, that's the ticket. we're all gonna be just fine.

2007-07-25 19:51:58 · 21 answers · asked by stank ho 2 in Politics

fictional man about town socialite Tony Sinclair? I know he appears feminine but I know he is supposed to be British. I was just wondering if you find him amusing or annoying? I find him amusing and this advertising campaign won me over enough to try Tanquaray Rangpur and I absolutely love it!
its no coincidence Tanquaray Rangpur starts with a T, its T for Terrific!!! Ready to Tanquaray, Rangpur style?!

2007-07-25 19:48:23 · 2 answers · asked by Anonymous in Other - Politics & Government

Fact sheet Message to the Congress of the United States Regarding International Emergency Economic Powers Act

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, as amended (50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.)(IEEPA), the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1601 et seq.)(NEA), and section 301 of title 3, United States Code,

I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States of America, find that, due to the unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States posed by acts of violence threatening the peace and stability of Iraq and undermining efforts to promote economic reconstruction and political reform in Iraq and to provide humanitarian assistance to the Iraqi people, it is in the interests of the United States to take additional steps with respect to the national emergency declared in Executive Order 13303 of May 22, 2003, and expanded in Executive Order 13315 of August 28, 2003, and relied upon for additional steps taken in Executive Order 13350 of July 29, 2004, and Executive Order 13364 of November 29, 2004. I hereby order:

Section 1. (a) Except to the extent provided in section 203(b)(1), (3), and (4) of IEEPA (50 U.S.C. 1702(b)(1), (3), and (4)), or in regulations, orders, directives, or licenses that may be issued pursuant to this order, and notwithstanding any contract entered into or any license or permit granted prior to the date of this order, all property and interests in property of the following persons, that are in the United States, that hereafter come within the United States, or that are or hereafter come within the possession or control of United States persons, are blocked and may not be transferred, paid, exported, withdrawn, or otherwise dealt in: any person determined by the Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Secretary of State and the Secretary of Defense,

(i) to have committed, or to pose a significant risk of committing, an act or acts of violence that have the purpose or effect of:

(A) threatening the peace or stability of Iraq or the Government of Iraq; or

(B) undermining efforts to promote economic reconstruction and political reform in Iraq or to provide humanitarian assistance to the Iraqi people;

(ii) to have materially assisted, sponsored, or provided financial, material, logistical, or technical support for, or goods or services in support of, such an act or acts of violence or any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order; or

(iii) to be owned or controlled by, or to have acted or purported to act for or on behalf of, directly or indirectly, any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order.

(b) The prohibitions in subsection (a) of this section include, but are not limited to, (i) the making of any contribution or provision of funds, goods, or services by, to, or for the benefit of any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order, and (ii) the receipt of any contribution or provision of funds, goods, or services from any such person.

Sec. 2. (a) Any transaction by a United States person or within the United States that evades or avoids, has the purpose of evading or avoiding, or attempts to violate any of the prohibitions set forth in this order is prohibited.

(b) Any conspiracy formed to violate any of the prohibitions set forth in this order is prohibited.

Sec. 3. For purposes of this order:

(a) the term "person" means an individual or entity;

(b) the term "entity" means a partnership, association, trust, joint venture, corporation, group, subgroup, or other organization; and

(c) the term "United States person" means any United States citizen, permanent resident alien, entity organized under the laws of the United States or any jurisdiction within the United States (including foreign branches), or any person in the United States.

Sec. 4. I hereby determine that the making of donations of the type specified in section 203(b)(2) of IEEPA (50 U.S.C. 1702(b)(2)) by, to, or for the benefit of, any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order would seriously impair my ability to deal with the national emergency declared in Executive Order 13303 and expanded in Executive Order 13315, and I hereby prohibit such donations as provided by section 1 of this order.

Sec. 5. For those persons whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order who might have a constitutional presence in the United States, I find that, because of the ability to transfer funds or other assets instantaneously, prior notice to such persons of measures to be taken pursuant to this order would render these measures ineffectual. I therefore determine that for these measures to be effective in addressing the national emergency declared in Executive Order 13303 and expanded in Executive Order 13315, there need be no prior notice of a listing or determination made pursuant to section 1(a) of this order.

Sec. 6. The Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Secretary of State and the Secretary of Defense, is hereby authorized to take such actions, including the promulgation of rules and regulations, and to employ all powers granted to the President by IEEPA as may be necessary to carry out the purposes of this order. The Secretary of the Treasury may redelegate any of these functions to other officers and agencies of the United States Government, consistent with applicable law. All agencies of the United States Government are hereby directed to take all appropriate measures within their authority to carry out the provisions of this order and, where appropriate, to advise the Secretary of the Treasury in a timely manner of the measures taken.

Sec. 7. Nothing in this order is intended to affect the continued effectiveness of any rules, regulations, orders, licenses, or other forms of administrative action issued, taken, or continued in effect heretofore or hereafter under 31 C.F.R. chapter V, except as expressly terminated, modified, or suspended by or pursuant to this order.

Sec. 8. This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right, benefit, or privilege, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, instrumentalities, or entities, its officers or employees, or any other person.

GEORGE W. BUSH

THE WHITE HOUSE,

July 17, 2007.

2007-07-25 19:47:51 · 13 answers · asked by inspiredbythemystery 2 in Law & Ethics

Gonzolas testified before Congress that his meeting wiith eight representatives was not about the Bush spying program on American citizens. He was given a chance to clarify it and repeated it was about "something else". His Spokesman stated he now tands by his statement.
Not only have the eight Congresmen attending the meeting contradicted him, but a document has emerged from the administration itself that clearly proves he commited purjery. As the JOD has become paralized and incapable of functioning becuase it is loaded with religious freaks from loony bin U should we get a Special Prosecutor appointed to take hin before a Grand Jury. .

I wonder if I might hear from defenders of Gonzales. At this point his culpability is so obvious that it is getting boring.

2007-07-25 19:46:47 · 4 answers · asked by sSuper critic 2 in Law & Ethics