would the U.S. benefit from another Independent President?

Answer 1

Absolutely!

A big side issue is how often the media recites skeptical myths about the inability of third parties to win. Can you say propaganda machine?

Worldwide, multi-party governments and parliaments seem to be more effective in meeting the needs of its citizens. In the US, the media seems to promote the concept that what's good for multi-national corporations is good for Americans. We know how good the occupation of Iraq is for the prosperity of GE, Halliburton, and the oil companies. However, how does this occupation affect our dedicated military personnel and families?

Answer 2

Yes the United States would benifit, as long as that independant had integrety. They would have to not care what anyone thought of them and would have to point out what the hard liner partisans voted against useing the media. They would also have to dust off the veto stamp and use it liberaly on bills filled with pork barrel spending pointing out why they vetoed it.

Answer 3

No, of course not. To get anything done, a president needs a political base. The President's party (ideally) stands behind him and supports his political agenda. Without that support, the prez would be crippled.

Answer 4

Yes.

If only to establish a foundation for a third party, but mostly to be beholden to NO party. It's the "base" of both major parties that limits party members' imaginations.

Answer 5

heck yes. someone that isnt tied to either group. someone that isnt obliged to do what their buddies say is good. the only thing is how will they get into office. keeping republicans AND democrats happy is like juggling a dozen knives, blindfolded. one mistake and both sides hate u