Many conservatives here in YA keep insisting, in defense of Bush, that there were WMDs in Iraq and that there was indeed a connection between Iraq and Al Queda. What I would like them to explain to me is that if they believe in George Bush and think he is right about what he tells us, why do they keep ignoring his own statements?
He stated just yesterday, in his press conference, unequivocably, that
1) There were no WMDs found in Iraq.
2) Iraq and Hussein had no connection to 9/11 whatsoever
The question is that if you agree with the President on his stand in Iraq and you think he speaks the truth, why do you keep insisting exactly the opposite? Don't you believe him? Is he lying about what he has said? I'm truly confused. Either you believe him or you don't, which is it?
2007-05-25
06:15:39
·
14 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics