I am a Catholic, and I usually vote Republican, mainly because I vote pro-choice. I do this of my own free will, because I think killing unborn children is more important that taxes, war, or health care. But anyway, I would probably find myself voting Democrat, if they could only get over the Abortion hurdle.
Apparently, Democrats think the choice of a woman to have sex is greater than the choice of a child to not be killed.
But if Guiliani runs, I don't think I could vote for him. I would probably go on to vote for a third party candidate. I know it would be "wasting my vote", but I would actually WANT a Democrat to beat Guiliani, so that the Republicans know to run a pro-life candidate from then on.
Would it be worth it? Should we let the Republican party lose to prove our point? Is it worth 4 years of -shudder- Hillary Clinton???
2007-02-15
05:37:49
·
21 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics