This, from an LA Times article foaming against the fence.
Which raises a good concern for those in favor of border security as well, although to the LA Times it is the one saving grace:
"At last, the good news. Four months ago, the Senate voted to build a border fence. Two months ago, it voted against paying for it. For the moment, there's $1.8 billion in an entirely different bill for a fence, but even that money may wind up being spent on something else.
Everyone who votes for this photo-op law now gets to go home and campaign on how tough he is on homeland security, voting for a monster fence, never mind that there may never be any money to build it. That's the beauty of it, after all — a 700-mile fence made of ink and paper and hot air. It could be the best bargain Congress ever gave us."
What do you think? Will they put their money where their mouths are?
http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/la-oe-morrison21sep21,0,2104216.column?coll=la-opinion-rightrail
2006-09-21
15:51:15
·
14 answers
·
asked by
DAR
7
in
Immigration