If the following were found in Iraq, why do people still think that there weren't WMD's in Iraq.
1.77 metric tons of enriched uranium
1,500 gallons of chemical weapons agents
17 chemical warheads containing cyclosarin (a nerve agent five times more deadly than sarin gas)
Over 1,000 radioactive materials in powdered form meant for dispersal over populated areas.
Thousands of war heads that were compatible with chemical agents.
15 seperate WMD attacks (Mustard, Nerve Agent, Tabun, CS) against the Kurds, Shia's, and Iranians.
As early as 1974 Suddam was trying to aquire Nuclear technology, whether for energy and/or weapons can be debated but he didn't have a good track record.
Also Iran was under long time destruction by Suddam, why don't they support what the US is doing in Iraq?
I understand that these actions and some of the supplies could have been from before the first gulf war, but it's a fact that Suddam had WMD's, I would think he would have used them eventually.
2006-08-07
04:32:44
·
8 answers
·
asked by
ESPforlife
2
in
Other - Politics & Government