And let a ligament person speak for the USA.
2006-08-07 04:32:05 · 56 answers · asked by sam s 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
ligaments don't speak very well, best let a person speak ...
2006-08-07 04:35:44 · answer #1 · answered by *grins* ™ 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
His term is not far from over.
I see no reason to insult him when he has done many good things for this country. The USA has been attacked by terrorists since the 1970's. Each time this country let it go.
The terrorist organizations and the countries that knowingly harbor them and encourage them should take the blame for such a blatant and damaging attack on the USA. While the American people want peace, there is no negotiating with such hateful, murdering cowards.
If any good has come from all of this, maybe these countries will put an end to those who make cowardly attacks on foriegn peoples.
2006-08-07 04:40:32 · answer #2 · answered by Texas Cowboy 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Who do you consider ligament? (legitimate) Surely not John Kerry, why don't people remember that he was our only other choice.
And why don't people like you realize that President Bush isn't sitting in the White House alone doing things at free will?
Please inform yourself before you ask such uninformed, immature questions. Granted this has not been the best president that we have had by far, but people like you will just find something else to complain about with our next president too, and probably not even vote.
2006-08-07 04:37:37 · answer #3 · answered by DeltaQueen 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Absolutely he she should step the hell aside. He has ruined everything. Dubya is nothing but a greedy monster. Oh but as long as people like a few names I won't mention keep saying "leave him alone he's under alot of pressure, He's a decent person, bla bla bla" all of the time then we will never get rid of him. GEORGE W BUSH... what a joke!
I just had to add one more thing after reading on. Someone said something about democracy. Do they mean what's left of democracy? A country that would give up their liberties for safety deserve neither one! Enjoy what's left of your freedom.
2006-08-07 04:41:22 · answer #4 · answered by Amy A 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Absolutely not! Considering all the disasters, terrorism, and the war we are waging, the Bush Administration has done an incredible job not only getting us away from recesssion (that started at the end of Clinton's Administration), but actually building a robust economy that has been able to withstand quite a lot.
The trouble of this administration (unlike the previous one) is its inability to properly communicate its accomplishment to the American people and to the world. Unlike President Clinton, who can sell ice to the eskimos, President Bush is no orator, and lacks the charisma to manipulate people. Nothwithstanding, this administration has done an incredible job on many fronts, but lack on others.
2006-08-07 04:38:55 · answer #5 · answered by EDDie 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm getting sick of people saying Bush is going a good job during difficult times. He created the difficult times.
Bush is not going to step aside. He is too arrogant to do that. That would like admitting defeat in his mind. He doesn't have enough decency or common sense either. But of course, he if did, would you really want Cheney in charge? Either way, we are still screwed.
2006-08-07 04:44:02 · answer #6 · answered by jeanhall 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no he was elected democraticaly, thats why this country is great , because no matter how much we hate our present president. We have the knowledge and the will to wait until his term expires then we either dont vote for him or we dont vote for his party if he;s not up for re-election anymore. If we remove him now we are just like anyother democratic government out there that when things dont go their way they either over throw the government or have a coup d etat. if you dont like him now vote for a democrat the next election. Let see if they can make the country worse or better. Its been going on for 300 hundred years lets not fix whats not broke and had been working for that long.
2006-08-07 04:39:44 · answer #7 · answered by kanto boy 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think he should but the more involved he gets with the Middle East the less likely that he will step aside....putting someone else in place of Bush to speak on his behalf would show weakness and unreadiness in that administration
2006-08-07 04:35:19 · answer #8 · answered by pete 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
in 2 years he will :p
2006-08-07 04:36:16 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
A lot of people critize Bush, but I think he's doing a decent job during a very difficult time. No, he should not step aside.
2006-08-07 04:34:44 · answer #10 · answered by Mikeo 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ligaments can't speak and Bush has them.
2006-08-07 04:34:05 · answer #11 · answered by MEL T 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋