How can 2 MD's, equal quals and experience, disagree on the value of Human Growth Hormone Therapy? Is it a question of lack of training, lack of post graduate study/reading? Lack of personal exposure? How can an ordinary individual make a determination about who is right and who is wrong (in this managed care environment and patient empowerment) , and how can an individual, who simply asks a physician, find himself subject to ridicule or even threat of discontinuation of care, and have to witness derogatory comments about so-called colleagues? And, how can some MD's deny the results of HGH even when "subjected" to documentation of positive results. And, finally, how can 1 or more MD's take the risk of a patients life when there is no personal evidence but rumour based on "coffee clatch conversation" , or legitimate papers of any negative side effects?
2006-11-04
03:12:46
·
1 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous