I would have a proposal for you if you do wish to proove your point, that is, that there is actually a scientific objection to the HIV causes AIDS model. There are 2 main points your claims do not address:
1- The HIV test is an accurate predictor of AIDS
2- HIV transmission is now hitting population which in general does not engage in recreational drugs, ie married women.
So to proove your point is right, that is either HIV does not exists/HIV is harmless, what I would propose is that a sample of say, 1000 people, agree to voluntarily receive an injection of untreated blood from a known HIV+ person which is shedding virus (ie not on ARV), and then agree to be tested for HIV periodically. We would then compare, among those who develop sustained HIV infection, how many will develop AIDS, with a sample HIV- (from this sample or outside) population.
Wouldn't this be correct scientific proof (appart from ethical issues, of course)?
2007-03-27
04:03:41
·
8 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous