I’m going to condense this writing and let you fill in the gaps. Late in the movie Al Gore produced, he states that the world has 6 billion people and will eventually level off at 9 billion. Why not stem the growth now? He says that global warming is man made; weather it is or not doesn’t matter. Let’s forget global warming and focus on the real problem of population. We as the people of earth should maybe consider pushing the idea of replacing our selves, one person one child and no more, a married couple would have two children.
Everything that is manufactured is based on creature comforts. People think I’m nuts when I say creature comforts but figure it out. Power plants make electrical energy to support homes with lights, heat, cooking, washing, T.V. computers and the list goes on. Over fifty percent of all power produced in this country comes fossil fuel (Coal). All manufacturing requires electrical power to produce products like cars, T.V. building materials, soap, steel, copper on and on. We are the purchasers of these products; they are made for us so we will be more comfortable. Even food is a creature comfort. If you don’t think so try going without and see how comfortable you are. This is just one example; so use your mind and go beyond what I write.
Some people blame religion for the over population and I’m sure they contribute because of their attitude on birth control. Let’s get to those that benefit by the population growth, those that would want population growth and depend on it. Business and industry need more people to buy their products, so that they might become bigger and bigger, after all the stock holders want more dividends. Muslims are a problem they are polygamists so let’s let Big Al work with them. He’s been selling global warming, if he can do that he could cool down those polygamists.
Now, I’ve laid the ground work. What would happen if we started a downward spiral in the population? Would people become more important and valuable as workers? Would we need less government cronies, would they have to get a real job? The government would yell that they need more money for more roads, but what do we need more roads for with less people. The environment wouldn’t suffer because with less people there would be less traffic in the wilderness. A lot less fossil fuel would be needed (coal). It would be a slow process getting it all back to what the world once was. Is this a better idea than Al’s and the environmentalist’s idea to shut down the world so the flowers can grow? What good are the flowers if there isn’t anyone to enjoy them? I’m going to leave all the rest of my thoughts to you. Let’s hear what you think.
2007-12-15
09:41:13
·
12 answers
·
asked by
Pumpkin
4
in
Global Warming