Where can I find some skeptical opinions on climate change from people with no scientific credentials at all?

Answer 1

The White House

Answer 2

What a silly question. Most of the skeptics are people with excellent scientific credentials because these are the people who are able to look at the claims by the IPCC and recognize how rediculous they are.
If you want to find people with no scientific credentials pretending that they know something then you will have to look at the GW activists. Just look for someone who claims that GW must be true because the 'scientific consensus' says it is true. That statement is clear sign that speaker knows nothing about science.

Answer 3

Everywhere, especially stuff from the right. Practically all the stuff that is from people with scientific credentials support the usual hypothesis that human emissions are accelerating warming. Skepticism about any scientific theory is important so that science can improve, but there is a general consensus on climate change, even with the occasional theory popping up with an alternative hypothesis.

Answer 4

Why do that. There are skeptical opinions on climate change from some of the most outstanding climatologists in the world. Global warming caused by humans is not any where near the unanimous opinion that most Chicken Little's would have you believe. Right now it is very self defeating for them to speak out on this global hoax.

Answer 5

ninety seven% of PAID scientists accept as true with AGW! 30,000 US scientists signed a petition denying climate replace. no one of their correct suggestions disagrees the climate is changing, in basic terms an entire fool would believe it is static, it is what the climate replace nuts are claiming. The earth's climate has been changing for extra effective than 4 billion years and could proceed to alter. Get an training then do the learn your self. stick to up on the thought of synthetic worldwide warming and make a selection for your self in accordance with information somewhat of politics. You sheeple have not have been given any clue what you're speaking approximately once you're making those claims. i do no longer watch FOX information yet I even have an incredible training from 2 of the optimal clinical faculties interior the rustic. i know how idiotic it is to declare something like ninety seven% say this or that. It ability no longer something because of the fact technological know-how isn't a acceptance contest. it is information and archives. AGW is what's declared as a concept and is somewhat weakly supported. it is no longer a shown fact by making use of any ability.

Answer 6

You can find plenty of people such as me. I have lived through the other "the sky is falling" scenarios for the last several decades. So far I have survived: The New Ice Age, The Ozone Hole, Acid Rain, The millennium bug, Alar Poisoned Apples, Overpopulation, Death of the Rain Forrest, Death of the Ocean and I am sure there are a few more that I have forgotten.

All were nonsense. Now this Global Warming jazz. You can fool some of the people some of the time...

Merry Christmas!

.

Answer 7

You can find all kinds of opinions on BOTH sides by people with no scientific credentials at all every single day right here.

Answer 8

I know of some place you can find skepticism from people who do have scientific credentials. You don't want that though do ya?

Answer 9

You can advocates and deniers with no scientific credentials almost anywhere. Check some newspapers or magazines. Almost none of the collumnists have scientific backgrounds.

Answer 10

Why would you want to do that? It's like asking a copy machine repair man to build you a house. Why not ask a scientist about an opinion contrary to popular belief?