that the relatively recent rise in global surface temperatures are just part of the Earth's natural cycle.
If this is the case, as so many on here have stated in their responses to questions, this must obviously mean that 98% of scientists are wrong, unaware or not taking these past cycles into consideration or just plain stupid enough to put their reputations on the line...especially when you think that each report/paper/idea etc.. is heavily scrutinized by peers and rightfully so because that is how scientists operate to maintain high standards of accuracy and reliability in their expert fields.
So my question is this, since so many also want to "talk" science facts...if 98% of scientists are telling us that there is an umbelievably high probability that humans are a major cause of recent warming trends, relatively speaking, then why should the rest of us, that is the lay, or moderately educated in this area that agree with the 98%, believe you over the majority? Evidence plz
2007-08-23
03:10:13
·
17 answers
·
asked by
town_cl0wn
4
in
Global Warming