The way I see it, there is all this brouhaha surrounding the need to transform a barren, lifeless, toxic planet in response to the suggested annihilation of the bountiful, lustrous Mother Earth. I would think, however, that it is quite irrational to believe it would be easier to transform Mars, or any other planet, rather than save our own. Think of the delicate balances at play here, our seas, our rainforests, our tectonic plates, haha. I say if people want to invest, they should invest in their families, children and neighbors of the importance of maintaining our gift. If we can think big enough, and have enough hope to believe we can live in an environment like mars, why can't we think big about our own atmosphere? Broken yes, but it's like saying we are willing to move out of the beachfront property because of some hurricane damage, over to the trash heap next to a toxic waste dump and try and make that work. Does anyone agree this doesn't make sense?
2007-04-17
16:41:52
·
7 answers
·
asked by
DanaZ
3