Environment - April 2007

I heard about it a while back, but I havent actually seen anything since.

2007-04-18 18:50:02 · 5 answers · asked by kaiah03 2

Can u please place the answer in the form of an exposition??

2007-04-18 16:42:06 · 7 answers · asked by L 2

2007-04-18 12:16:33 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-04-18 11:53:31 · 3 answers · asked by boncat8 2

if u were a biocentric and an anthropocentric, wat would you think of the Yellowstone National Park??

2007-04-18 11:51:49 · 1 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-04-18 11:43:15 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous

I believe I have read somewhere that throughout earth history there was almost none ice on the poles, so the planets temperature must have been high. This was interrupted by catastrophes such as meteor impacts that, for small periods of time, changed the climate into ice-ages.

Now here’s the question. Could the climate changes be a natural thing and the pollution only act to speed it?

2007-04-18 11:35:09 · 2 answers · asked by elcabong 2

2007-04-18 11:34:26 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous

I do.

2007-04-18 11:33:11 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous

CO2 levels are rising, trees use CO2 for photosyntheses. Has human produced CO2 lead to more rapid tree growth since the start of the Industrial Revolution?

2007-04-18 11:21:06 · 6 answers · asked by robert_impey 1

2007-04-18 11:16:53 · 4 answers · asked by holkrum 2

2007-04-18 11:13:14 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous

I am interested in the negative and positive effects of human respiration on the environment.

2007-04-18 10:48:16 · 5 answers · asked by Mike 1

and Why?

2007-04-18 10:41:37 · 14 answers · asked by jackknowswhatitsat 1

Would it have been best if we ran out of fossil fuels today, to cease the destruction of our ozone, which is the only thing that keeps glaciers from melting and our sea-level homes from being flooded, or to keep using it to help ourselves and others survive? It's not like anyone is going to start using bio-diesel or solar power anytime soon in the U.S.

2007-04-18 10:38:28 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

if u were an anthropocentric what would you think of if there was a nuclear power plant in your city? how about if u were biocentric? philosophical?

2007-04-18 10:24:59 · 1 answers · asked by Anonymous

The sun warms the earth. How much of that heat gets to the earth varies due to cosmic radiation. This is a proven fact.

As the air warms, the ocean warms and oceanic algae grows and prospers. This emits millions times more CO2 than humans could possibly do. It takes around 800 years for the oceans (which cover 2/3rds of this planet) to warm and therefore the relationship between a rise in CO2 and the air temperature is that the increase in CO2 will come 800 years after any significant warming in air temperature. This again is a proved fact.

Put simply there really isn't much humans, as a relatively insignificant species inhabiting this planet, can do to change or cause global warming.

What we are doing though is crippling the third world. We are dictating to poor countries in Africa Asia and South America that they cannot build power stations to burn fossil fuels, leaving these countries with no electricity. This means poor schools, hospitals, basically keeping them poor

2007-04-18 10:17:43 · 14 answers · asked by MrsWibbly 2

with all types of birth control and diseases in the world why do we keep on growing

Do you think all those hormones/steroids they use with animals and plants to produce more are one of the cause of over population. Also new medication discoveries that pro longs our lives since our age rates of natural deaths are way older than 100 yrs ago.

2007-04-18 09:59:30 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous

now think about this. is it really possible to stop the future? if you could kill yourself, you stop your life, but not the future, and if you could freeze everything in its place, then you the universe wouldn't "move", but that still couldn't stop the future. Time would just go on while everything isn't moving.
P.S.I know, I have too much time on my hands : )

2007-04-18 09:55:08 · 1 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-04-18 08:58:58 · 2 answers · asked by slamdunkster10 1

Read that yahoo headline:

http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20070418/lf_afp/lifestylewarmingdeath_070418143046

and explain why it is right or wrong.

2007-04-18 08:23:31 · 8 answers · asked by l.albatros 1

2007-04-18 08:12:04 · 2 answers · asked by Dylan G 1

Since technology is changing so quickly what happens to all the outdated tech such as cell phone, computers, Tv's
and what happens to the tech that we can't recycle?

2007-04-18 08:11:07 · 4 answers · asked by vertigle 1

My point is why not just burn through the oil and let the planet work out the problem when we run out.

2007-04-18 07:57:07 · 12 answers · asked by captainimij 3

The latest theory is that cell phones are causing the destruction of honey bees. If proven, what do you think? What's more important to mankind, honey bees or cell phones?

2007-04-18 07:41:14 · 15 answers · asked by Wego The Dog 5

2007-04-18 07:29:53 · 4 answers · asked by SHAWNA 1

like from people

2007-04-18 07:04:40 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

If everyone does it, it would help a lot!

2007-04-18 06:52:17 · 16 answers · asked by anil m 6

2007-04-18 06:46:35 · 3 answers · asked by v3pas 1

2007-04-18 06:38:16 · 4 answers · asked by KENDALL W 1