English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-04-18 11:13:14 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Environment

14 answers

Yes it does!!!!
Every time you fart you should hug a seal!!

2007-04-18 11:17:33 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Yes it does. A fart is primarily methane which is much worse than carbon dioxide when it comes to global warming.

One methane fart would have the same global warming potential as 296 carbon dioxide farts.

Cattle produce a lot of methane because they burp and fart a lot - they digest grass in a four stage process which produces a lot of gas. Overall 18% of methane emissions that are caused by man are the result of cattle burping and farting.

2007-04-18 11:23:58 · answer #2 · answered by Trevor 7 · 2 1

i heard on radio that the worlds livestock f@rts contribute to 18% of global warming
what a bummer
xxx

2007-04-18 11:24:05 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I hope not. The government will probably start a fart tax and start taxing beans.

What would the hippies do if they found out beans beans, the magical fruit, was killing the planet one fart at a time?

Hippy vegans would have to rethink everything.

2007-04-18 11:22:20 · answer #4 · answered by American Citizen 3 · 0 0

Those who watch south park will recall an episode were environmentalists were going around smelling their own farts. That is the reason.

2007-04-18 12:02:59 · answer #5 · answered by eric c 5 · 0 0

specific they do via fact as ruminant animals their digestive systems produce methane. mutually as methane has a heavily greater advantageous warming skill (around 20X i think of of) together as while in comparison with carbon dioxide, it has a cut back concentration interior the ambience via sheer parts of CO2-emitting factors (e.g. vehicles, fossil fuels, and so on.). What I hate maximum approximately this debate is together as human beings blame it on the cows themselves, fairly than the purple meat/purple meat marketplace breeding unnaturally large populations of cows in centred factors. it extremely is how cows are seen a element of international warming. not particularly via fact they're ruminant animals, yet in addition via fact together as raised on large-scale production unit farms their waste is in many situations not disposed of in an environmentally-friendly way (many times saved in open-air liquid "lagoons" deemed for fertilizer yet in addition fairly agencies to atmospheric deposition because of the fact of volatile gases). Such lagoons are definitely not unique to cows, yet in addition uncomplicated in rooster and swine production unit farms. ...And there are the idiots that fairly do have self concept that by skill of eating/killing cows they're helping decrease lower back greenhouse gases, together as extremely they're helping those large unethical farming practices and producing an ever-increasing call for for such farms to reproduce plenty greater advantageous cows.

2016-11-25 20:34:11 · answer #6 · answered by stitt 4 · 0 0

Yes, and don't get some do good-er to try to make it illegal. I can see it now a $200 fine for not having your ********* .

2007-04-18 11:24:58 · answer #7 · answered by Robert S 5 · 0 0

not really, apparently cows make up alot of the gases in the polution, but thats renewable as its part of the cycle, so no not really

2007-04-22 04:39:21 · answer #8 · answered by This Charming man 1 · 0 0

yes ofcourse

eating beans is anti eco-logical as well as anti social

2007-04-18 11:58:38 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

It's methane, so yep

2007-04-18 12:40:21 · answer #10 · answered by Tatiana Kalinina 2 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers