is global warming a moral issues?

Answer 1

Sure. Rich countries can cope with the effects of global arming. It will take huge sums of money and will wreck their economies, but few will die.

Poor countries already struggling to feed themselves can't afford to cope. There many people will die of starvation. Caused mostly by greenhouse gases from rich countries.

That sounds like a moral issue to me.

Answer 2

is survival of the species a moral issue
you tell me

amoral behaviour by people who have followed amoral Alien philosyphies as regards to Nature
makes it more of an amoral issue

the only moral solution might be to sacrifice the amoral elements to the gods ,to take the pressures of food production,water shortage and stop the destruction of Nature ,using the remains to fertilize the lands destroyed by the agro chemicals used by mono culture farming

the Gods would be over the Moon and those who love the environment may be able to recover something, after those who ¨owned ¨everything have gone

Ooops
i forgot global warming is a Natural process ,Man had nothing to do with it,
still it would solve a lot of problems

Answer 3

First, a sprint bit a rebuttal on your assumption that international warming might desire to be brought about by using people: a million. technological expertise isn't a democracy. Its a dictatorship of the data. whether or no longer ninety 5% of human beings have faith that's irrelevant. At one element, human beings reported the Earth grew to become into flat. Is it? 2. there is no longer a consensus. there is conflicting records. 3. lots of the technological expertise in the back of the disaster is undesirable! a. fake useful trend acceptance: Seeing shapes interior the clouds or types interior the information, whether or no longer theyre there or no longer. b. affirmation Bias: people who think of international warming is brought about by using people will prepare it does, on a similar time as ignoring conflicting records. c. loss of controls: it is not attainable to regulate the climate, for this reason the approach is doubtful at suitable, invalid at worst. Segundo, consistent with how scientists could make the main of international warming. a million. Scientists receive furnish money from agencies that many times have agendas. If a lobbying company needs to coach that people reason international warming, they might discover scientists to assert so. Scientists that gain this will proceed to get can provide. people who don't won't. asserting what human beings want you to is worthwhile. And if likeminded human beings administration the media, it helps your recognition too. seem at Al Gore. international warming is fashionable and freeing a good paper on that's respected. Scientists are actually not almost as noble as we are hoping. i'm interior the trenches of technological expertise, so i'm getting to make certain bits and products first hand. incredibly, right it is how I see your argument: You: "there is international warming! And that's guy's fault! anybody knows!" [straight forward expertise rhetoric] Me: "I disagree." You: "you may desire to be ignorant or a morally drained person" [advert Homenim attack] i may well be interested in added talk to sparkling up those themes, yet i'm afraid that yahoo solutions does not permit such issues.

Answer 4

Yes it is.

Morality is the communal value system. Part of our value system is the neo-Christian ethic. That ethic has made people believe that we are in charge of nature, rather than a part of it. We are doomed because we are our own false prophets. It is a root cause of Global Warming.

Until people embrace the ideology of Deep Ecosocial Egaltarianism there isn't much hope the situation will ever get better.
.

Answer 5

Nope, can't control nature. The earth has evolved and had land mass changes on a consistent pattern. We have had extinctions, famines, quakes, volcano's everything. Hugging a tree or not driving a car is not going to have any impact. Now Al Gore using a flam thrower to melt ice shelfs may have a moral issue to boost sales of his movie,,LOL

Answer 6

If you consider fleecing people of their money thru panic, Controversial science and coercion a moral, then yes

Answer 7

hey i tink i agree wit carnac wellll i dont no im but tink its a climate issue and a continental issue bcoz its a problem dat can destroy countries if it grows in the sense dat if the sun gets much it could melt ices and could increases sea level and could flood close countries and some other countires

Answer 8

It shouldn't be but radical political activists are trying to making it so.

Answer 9

No, it's a climate issue.