Is it true that there are more trees today than there were 200 or 300 years ago (personally think not)?

Question

But I heard someone make that statement...

Answer 1

What I have heard is that the tree or lumber co. have Sean the need so they plant many trees . So there is more trees than there was 40 years ago. We are not doing as good as we can but we will do better.

Answer 2

There are 6 energy measures that tell the arbor story. There
is one percent less tree covered land than 200 years ago.
One is ancient, during the warmest periods trees are
dormant. This drastic rest leads them to upstart period.
Here is the source of legends like Lord of the Rings. When
spirit trees came into being. Next the fruitopia period and
this is the longest. Also called the creation period, like the
garden of Eden, there was a shortage, and portage,
polimetrics took shape having pod explosions and coconuts
floating quite navigationally to new lands. Then the volcanoe ages thinned out the weeds. Then the earliest farms had scratching trees and sabertooths making giant
emu and strange fauna carrying the first edible pods, like
fruits to new places. The orchard period as today, there are
25 million domestic full sweet orchard trees. There is a
game reserve of 240 million nearly domestic orchard sweets still in this savor tooth period led by elephants presently. If counted by species there are 720 trillion trees.
This does not include saplings, buckled, or damaged,
twisted or dwarfed. Odd trees is about 1 more trillion.
Apples of wild types due to their unreachable locations is
quite common about 30 billion. Next are figs, dates,
palms, tangerines, lemon, and plums about 10 billion total.
In one square mile of healthy pines of 50 feet tall, there are
200,000 trees. Remembering the earth is not flat, and
there are still many uncharted areas, tree covers about
30% of the planet. http://www.familyfun.com

Answer 3

I personally think that we have less trees now. I live in central America Panama and now they are cutting down an extensive amount of trees and all the wild life to make the expansion of the canal. It is very sad but it must be done since we must assure that we have more ships cross the panama canal. Lets not look at only Panama lets see what is happening in Brazil and other countries trees are just being taken down that sad and dangerous for us humans?

Answer 4

Yes, but...

People used to use wood for everything, construction, fuel, etc. Now we use many other things too. That has allowed trees to recover.

But, many trees today are in stands of one kind of tree, all the same age. On "tree farms". We have fewer ecologically sound and diverse forests.

Answer 5

Believe it or not there are more tree's. As the mature one's are being taken out , they are replacing plus, a big thanks to the airports(not all of em yet, but B.A. DUE TO THE CONJESTION in the high ways they have donated tree's to be planted due to the airplanes emmissions and perhaps guilt to Mother nature) So ''THANK YOU B.A.'' Good Question

Answer 6

the globe used to be covered in forrests
just England was a collection of forrests
so was Spain and the rest of Europe
,lebanon,theSahara used to be forrests etc.
take a look at the planet today from a distance look at the areal photos from space ,and you will never ask such a silly question again.

Answer 7

i think of it will be artists who bypass away at the back of a extensive "physique" of paintings, which skill somebody who purely releases a pair of albums and then supplies not extra will in all possibility be forgotten. That being pronounced, it could be artists who compose their very own song and are extremely gifted and gifted at their device (or voice) of determination. case in point, Frank Zappa is an uncomplicated determination. 80 albums and crossed maximum of musical limitations...then you certainly've your floor breakers like Hendrix, who in ordinary terms left a small physique of paintings, yet completely replaced the international. extremely the Beatles. The Rolling Stones. Queen. Zep. Floyd. The Who. and particular. you could no longer forget approximately Edward Van Halen. He single-handedly spawned a sparkling era of neo-classical shredders who will additionally in all possibility be remembered: Malmsteen, Vai, etc. in case then you definately look into bands who've continuously launched high quality fabric over a protracted quantity of time you could no longer bypass away out Rush. then you certainly've Bowie, Kraftwerk, Dylan, Springsteen, Elvis, Clapton, Jeff Beck, ... i ought to bypass on. the ingredient is, each thing is so nicely documented now. think of approximately all the misplaced compositions of the super Masters. (Bach. Beethoven, Mozart, etc.) there replaced into no thank you to checklist them, in ordinary terms a paper path. we've become so adept at preserving for historic purposes that i'm unhappy to assert that throughout 2 hundred years, some human beings would think of that Britney Spears could nicely be remembered alongside Fiona Apple, yet we here interior the present know which you would be able to no longer utter those 2 names interior the comparable sentence without guffawing! i desire that trusts time-venerated at present like "Rock N Roll corridor of recognition" will shop directly to verify that the record is culled and chosen to honor in ordinary terms people who're purely and deserving of being remembered. in my opinion, i think of on the edge of the sting is a Masterpiece, besides. Cheers!

Answer 8

I'm not really sure. Can you count them all and get back to me?