Do I need to explain this better?
…one that made us better adapted to survive, a complete reversal of course - we knew there would be fewer wars, less environmental harm, less crime, etc. Does 'Better adapted' mean that a species is better equipped to survive After WWII there were less people dying in wars? Right? But was it a step forward, in terms of our survival? Would there be less war? Would there be less crime? Would there be less environmental harm into the future? Haven’t we brought ourselves closer to destruction? Does evolution imply that we are more evolved than other species? No other species has done more to destroy the world. To apply the theory better, what If we expand that to the long-term - Did evolution make us better equipped to survive than in all previous steps? Did ‘cavemen’ come anywhere close to destroying the world? And long-term – what will happen?
2006-12-07
22:26:23
·
3 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous