Philosophy - March 2007

rated taboo,and why? thank you.

2007-03-28 01:44:07 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-03-28 01:37:47 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-03-28 01:35:09 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

what happens to us

2007-03-28 01:17:32 · 17 answers · asked by joy_m_d 1

Some people are soooooo intense about it. What's the big deal? It seams logic ( getting a job, being on time, fitting in) but
not worth getting mad for.
When you truly think about it, morality is invented by us. We choose, we decide....

2007-03-28 01:14:46 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

I like how kind I am to animals.

2007-03-28 01:01:51 · 16 answers · asked by SHELTIELUVER 3

What about a Ph.D?
I'd love to teach philosophy in a college classroom, but obviously such options are limited. What other opportunities might I have?

2007-03-28 00:53:31 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-03-28 00:41:09 · 9 answers · asked by poopski 3

it is my prayer that our nation bring our men home , back to our nation, we are in the middle of a civil war.. God please help us get our troops home, in the powerful and mighty name of Jesus christ i ask please please please

2007-03-28 00:17:20 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous

is it important to you that people accept you and love you, and want to have you in there life as a close and good friend. in my opinion we all want to be accepted and loved, note we cannot force anyone to love and accept us this is a true fact, but threw kindness and careing and respect to others we can win there love by goodness toward them own our part.. just how important is it to you that you are loved?

2007-03-28 00:04:47 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-03-28 00:00:10 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

am I wrong?

2007-03-27 23:50:03 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-03-27 23:30:59 · 14 answers · asked by Holistic Mystic 5

2007-03-27 23:02:32 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-03-27 22:26:49 · 48 answers · asked by HarryBore 4

Tell me what you thought about Fausts search for the truth.

2007-03-27 22:19:41 · 4 answers · asked by melbournewooferblue 4

2007-03-27 22:15:49 · 15 answers · asked by snehil s 2

If there is a God, why did he create Man? Such an Omnipotent being, such power; what need does he have for Man-kind? Why would he create a Universe with no intention of interacting with it. Maybe I'm just blind. I mean I haven't read the Bible, I dont go to church. I'm not religious at all. But IF there is a God, why?

2007-03-27 22:15:23 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

To live like a hero is better than dieing like a coward.
OR
To die like a hero is better than living like a coward.

2007-03-27 21:48:22 · 9 answers · asked by AshOsaki 1

OK, I have a frank question on this never ending dilemma on why some things are frowned upon and other things are let go.

Many people say that Inner Beauty is much more important then Outer Beauty; while I do agree to this to a certain point I sometimes find it in a certain way a effortless factor on behalf of many people using it as their defense mechanism.

Lest face it, if your blind, handicapped, disabled, or have anything else that isn't you fault but were born like, then yes, Inner Beauty is what shines most, and will make you look and feel great and thats it...

However, what I find ironic is that Inner Beauty is allowed to grow while the Outer is Beauty is considered too "Blonde" and superficial, so anyone who looks better the someone else is considered dumb, stupid or both...

My point is, why is Inner Beauty is allowed to grow, while putting implants to make you look better frowned upon? Aren't they both the same? Just in different places and ways?

2007-03-27 21:45:19 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

Thanks

2007-03-27 21:44:59 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

by Bill Harris from Centerpoint on his Mind Chatter magazine. I am soo disappointed! Anyone have any comments to this?

2007-03-27 21:36:13 · 7 answers · asked by JustSomeone 1

I think the Ultimate question is not if "God" exists........it is what existed before "GOD" ?
If the universe and everything in it ,( the planets, stars,Galaxy's,matter, inert and animated things), simply came about by something like the "Big Bang" and simply "is", then even in that scenario it all began from "something".
Yet when someone suggests that , that "something" is called "God"
The question still remains....What, or Who "created" GOD?

I think the true question and answer ,
is if you believe that "God" doesn't exist, then from what did the universe originate? - Big Bang...then from which did that originate?
If you believe that that "God" does exist then ... where did God originate from?

So my conclusive answer is that "God" does exist on some level , but that by considering my logic above, it proves God does not exist as we have been conditioned to understand "God"
Because if God is considered the creator of heaven and earth ... then who is "Gods" ...GOD?

2007-03-27 21:34:40 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-03-27 21:26:17 · 10 answers · asked by odade11 2

No difference is distinguishable between nothingness and you if you are not as "part, whole, equivalence, uniqueness, limit, link, influence, sensation, origin, derivative, rule, condtion, intent, and fulfillment."

2007-03-27 21:23:49 · 10 answers · asked by The Knowledge Server 1

2007-03-27 21:19:25 · 18 answers · asked by PeaceFrog 2

The Scientific Method (the true one and not the one driven by money) says that we must put our thoeries and beliefs to the test by trying to disprove them before they can be confirmed.

That means that you through everything that you have at it, everything that should weaken and distory it, and if it remains then it is if not confirmed then solid and plausible.

However many do not seem to take this apraoch to thier lives. They hear or see something and grab it with both hands, sometimes without even testing it. Then it becomes the corner stone of thier life and anyone who comes along and even says something different is percived as a threat and attacked as such.

Take the example of religion, some are religious others are aithiest. But I have to ask after speaking with both sides, how many have even checked thier facts, how many are just repeating what they have heard someone else say?

Why don't people seek proof anymore (if ever)?

Serious answers only please.

Thanks.

2007-03-27 21:18:56 · 7 answers · asked by Arthur N 4

2007-03-27 21:18:39 · 23 answers · asked by Anna S 1

2007-03-27 21:17:52 · 48 answers · asked by Anna S 1

1. No difference is distinguishable between nothingness and you if you are not as part.

2. No difference would be distinguishable between nothingness and you if you are not as part.

3. No difference could be distinguishable between nothingness and you if you are not as part.

4. No difference will be distinguishable between nothingness and you if you are not as part.

Which one is grammatically correct?

2007-03-27 21:04:08 · 9 answers · asked by The Knowledge Server 1