Moral Relativism is a popular idea floating around the world today, and the way I understand it, Moral relativism is the idea that moral values are based on what society or an individual deems is right, this may seem to some a liberating concept, self choice and all that, but according to this theory, if society had been accepting of genocide, would Hitler, Stalin, Mao and there like have been innocent? Would there decision to have millions killed been "right" if society had thought it to be. Just looking for some thought on the subject.
2007-07-31
18:39:37
·
9 answers
·
asked by
Ludwig Wittgenstein
5