`m not talking about the creationism vs. evolution debate. Thats been over with for quite awhile. We have the fossils, Dna, Controlled experiements, age of rocks, to prove Evolution is the way to go.
I have heard there is a debate within the scientific community about Natural selection. They are not in disupute that life evolved - rather they debate about what role natural selection plays in the evolutionary process. Some say it is the motivating mechanism - others say it`s not. I don`t know what is the arguement on the other side of the debate. If natarul selection is not the motivating mechanism then what is? If you could please explain to me the other side of the debate among biologist I would appreciate it!
Yes I`m aware this is a biology inquiry. I tried posting it over there with no sucess. Hopefully my fellow philosophers can help me out on this one?
2007-07-30
10:47:53
·
7 answers
·
asked by
Future
5