2007-07-30 06:59:40 · 7 answers · asked by *Jenni* 2 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
Weaver Ant's are smarter because they can work together like one team that human canot do.
2007-07-30 20:36:26 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The mere fact that you, and not some weaver ant called Andy Ant, is asking this question, I think, answers it already! Sure, the ants have abilities we don't have, and sure they en-masse (as a community) co-operate and operate extremely efficiently, whereas we dumbass hooman beans are all individualistic Johny-I-did-it-my-ways. Yet, if push comes to shove, we still beat their hands vs claws down in the brains department, and that, as the saying goes, is what makes the difference!
2007-07-30 14:54:46 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Philosophers have been debating this for years, all the way back to Plato's famous "Dialogues on weaver ants"
2007-07-30 14:05:36 · answer #3 · answered by JND 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
My vote's for the ants. At this rate the roaches will be here long after we're gone. Survival of the fittest you know. Clean your counter tops real good with soap and you survive another day at least.
2007-07-30 16:56:03 · answer #4 · answered by hb12 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I guess that would depend on how you are defining "smart". I would think that humans are more adaptable, and have greater effect on their environment than the ants, so the humans?
2007-07-30 14:10:29 · answer #5 · answered by marconprograms 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sometimes I really do wonder whether that should read sheep or human...
2007-07-30 14:20:35 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
what ants huh i dont see any.
2007-07-30 15:16:31 · answer #7 · answered by Travis James 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋