No difference is distinguishable between nothingness and you if you are not as "part, whole, equivalence, uniqueness, limit, link, influence, sensation, origin, derivative, rule, condtion, intent, and fulfillment."
2007-03-27 21:23:49 · 10 answers · asked by The Knowledge Server 1 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
Why is this statement false?
2007-03-27 21:24:25 · update #1
The statement is true.... if you are not as "part, whole........and fulfillment", then you have no existence at all, which means you are not distinguishable from nothingness.
2007-03-29 00:11:42 · answer #1 · answered by small 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
YOU are a person. A creation of God. He don't make junk. I have never met a person, a YOU, that I didn't learn something from.
A totally handicapped person, in an iron lung, with no normal function, having a machine do the basic functions of life done for them... This person cannot Do anything to be come a part of any of that list of words you gave. Yet, they can teach you something merely by existing. I don't see existing on your list of words..
Perhaps the statement is true.. there is no difference because .. there is no chance of Not being that "part, whole, equivalence, uniqueness, limit, link, influence, sensation, origin, derivative, rule, condition , intent, and fulfillment."
Who told you the statement was false.?
2007-03-28 04:43:27 · answer #2 · answered by ricketyoldbat 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If I had no language, what would it be? False. Why? Because all of the words in your questions are non-existent for me, even as non-being or, in other words, imagination.
"Stages of Cognitive Development. Piaget identified four stages in cognitive development:
Sensorimotor stage (Infancy). In this period (which has 6 stages), intelligence is demonstrated through motor activity without the use of symbols. Knowledge of the world is limited (but developing) because its based on physical interactions / experiences. Children acquire object permanence at about 7 months of age (memory). Physical development (mobility) allows the child to begin developing new intellectual abilities. Some symbollic (language) abilities are developed at the end of this stage.
Pre-operational stage (Toddler and Early Childhood). In this period (which has two substages), intelligence is demonstrated through the use of symbols, language use matures, and memory and imagination are developed, but thinking is done in a nonlogical, nonreversable manner. Egocentric thinking predominates
Concrete operational stage (Elementary and early adolescence). In this stage (characterized by 7 types of conservation: number, length, liquid, mass, weight, area, volume), intelligence is demonstrated through logical and systematic manipulation of symbols related to concrete objects. Operational thinking develops (mental actions that are reversible). Egocentric thought diminishes.
Formal operational stage (Adolescence and adulthood). In this stage, intelligence is demonstrated through the logical use of symbols related to abstract concepts. Early in the period there is a return to egocentric thought. Only 35% of high school graduates in industrialized countries obtain formal operations; many people do not think formally during adulthood. "
http://chiron.valdosta.edu/whuitt/col/cogsys/piaget.html
No difference is distinguishable between nothingness and you if you are not is "part, whole, equivalence, uniqueness, limit, link, influence, sensation, origin, derivative, rule, condtion, intent, and fulfillment."
2007-03-29 20:45:04 · answer #3 · answered by Psyengine 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If "you are" then you are "something" so there IS a distinguishable difference between nothingness and you since you are something and nothingness is nothing.
It ignores the obvious in that you are something and someone who has all those things listed that make you unique and special and it implies denying that reality!
This sounds very Hari Krishna like to negate oneself into nothingness.
2007-03-28 04:51:09 · answer #4 · answered by Who's got my back? 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Please Please why do you keep asking the same question?
The long list of words don't seem to have anything to do with the other words.
And asking for us to distinguish the no difference. That grammatically is a doable negative.
Please find some new words that will make your question more answerable
2007-03-28 04:45:37 · answer #5 · answered by clcalifornia 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
YOU just don't word things that anyone can understand.
Distingusishable......who uses that word??? Most of these words that you list arn't used together.
Please learn conversational english. And WHY do you keep asking the same questions over and over again?????
How many people need to tell you that you are nuts?
2007-03-28 04:29:40 · answer #6 · answered by cuttiestrawberypie 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
alot of fancy words that could be used for the same meaning. thats all it is 2 me sorry
2007-03-28 04:36:58 · answer #7 · answered by mudfish 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because the dictionary police said so.
2007-03-28 04:36:14 · answer #8 · answered by skcs11 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
wordiness
2007-03-28 06:35:30 · answer #9 · answered by indecipherable_scribblings 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
may be this can help you
2007-03-28 04:38:11 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋