I read an article recently that stated that many busy pros who sell a lot of photos shoot primarily in jpeg. The reasons given had to do with workflow and time constraints. I'm talking about people who sell to magazines, postcards, stock, websites, etc. It was stated that they (the pros in question) shoot raw only when they can see a need to be exceptionally careful. I'm an enthusiast-level photographer who is considering a photography sideline, selling stock shots, and maybe producing some scenery/ cityscape type stuff for the tourism industry, etc. (I travel a lot...) If I can shoot HQ jpeg instead of Raw, and reduce my time in front of the computer, I'd be a happy boy. Any thoughts?
2007-12-19
22:42:46
·
11 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Photography