Why is it that warming alarmist will point to something like Hurricane Humberto and say that it quickly becoming a hurricane is proof of global warming only after the fact that it did become a hurricane quickly?
If it was part of global warming, if we know what causes global warming, if we can predict the effects of global warming, this should have been easy to see coming and have warnings issued weeks before Humberto actually started to form off the coast.
But it wasn't because global warming is only accurate after something happened, as everything that happened is the result of global warming.
If global warming was real, we would be able to forecast these events many days before they happened.
More proof that this is nothing more than a money making scheme.
2007-09-14
07:21:05
·
12 answers
·
asked by
Dr Jello
7
in
Global Warming