Why follow a religion that is proven to be false.?

Question

Catholics, there is so many things in your religion that dont line up with the bible, Mormons Joseph Smith's prophecies have been proven to be mostly false, Mohommad, Buddah and others still dead and havent risen. The KJV is 100% true noone ever found error. Why follow a second rate path?

Answer 1

The Catholics have fallen far from the vine, but many will be cast off "as a fig tree casts her untimely figs". The ones that are cast off eternally with no questions asked must surely be the child abusers. The Mormons follow a false prophet, but their saving grace is that they have not completely replaced the Holy Bible. Mohammad is damned, but at least Buddah is peaceful.

Be watchful, and strengthen the things which remain, that are ready to die: for I have not found thy works perfect before God.

Answer 2

Catholics are the people who brought you the Bible in the first place. The original - not the truncated Martin Luther version.

The King James Version?? You've got to be kidding. A mediocre translation of a translation.

St. Jerome rocks. (If you really know anything at all about the Bible, you'll know who St. Jerome was, and why he's important to the Bible).

Edit:

FYI: The books of the OT that Protestants consider "apocrypha" were actually originally in the Old Testament, and were included in the Septuagint, the Jewish/Greek OT translated and approved of by Jewish scholars of the time. They were later removed from the Jewish Canon about 200-250 AD by Jewish leaders in reaction to Christian use of the Septuagint. During the Protestant Reformation, Martin Luther decided to remove these books from the OT of his version of the Christian Bible, to fall in line with the latter-day revision of the Jewish OT Canon.

Jim B:

"If the KJV was good enough for Paul it's good enough for me.."

You aren't speaking of the apostle Paul (I hope you aren't anyway)? The King James Version of the Bible was adopted in 1611 AD, actually a few years *after* the Douay-Reims version, which is the first English Catholic translation of the Bible. If you want a good and true-to-the-original English translation check out the Douay-Reims version - has all of the original books of the Bible, in their original order, with their original titles.

Answer 3

Your KJV of the Bible is an incomplete volume of what true scripture is, secondly to criticize without knowing about someone or some thing is blatant stupidity, it surpasses ignorance by a long shot.
Catholicism is truly scriptural based unlike many a religious fundamentalist group. It follows the Gospels to the tee, and there is not doubt in that if you actually took the time to study the religion, its tradition and the liturgy. But why would you take time out to that when all you can do is spread lies and hatred.
Thank God for His most divine mercy, and the peace achieved in it.
I wasn't even going to address your supposed question because it doesn't merit an answer. But I cannot sit idly by and let you or anyone else beseech and write such heretical and unfounded lies.
May God have mercy on your soul.

Answer 4

Way to generalize. Why shoud ANYONE believe YOU???

As to your precious King James, how about Matt 6 :13???

"For thine is the kingdom, the power and the glory forever amen" is NOT in the original Greek. Look it up. Even the MacArthur Study Bible admits it!

WAIT A MINUTE! Mohammed didn't rise? Then what is the Dome of the Rock all about????

Answer 5

If the KJV was good enough for Paul it's good enough for me..

Do you hear yourself.. The Church doesn't hold the KJV to be inerrant She claims the word of God preserved for us in it's original language is inerrant.. There are several excellent translations the NAS is good (it's the one I use) the NIV is good...In study you should use differnt translation to open up the original intent.. Notice I said STUDY not devotional.. I find nothing better than the KJV for devotional.. Open up to the Holy Spirit to show you great truths in the word. IHS Jim

Answer 6

My friend People believe what they want to believe whether it is the truth or not.All of us believe a lot of things which probably are not true.That is also true about people like you and me who read the K.J.V. every day.The cannon of our New testament was decided on in the year 397 A.D.Those 27 books or epistles where added to the 39 Old Testament books.The R.C. church also includes the apocripha.

Answer 7

What makes you think of that guy is able to proving a faith is incorrect while he can't even get the climate superb ? i think of that's a query that takes some faith in. And in having faith in proving that something dose no longer exist is after all a faith onto itself. Don’t you think of ? i'm vulnerable to think of that there ought to be some greater potential, merely because of the complexity of the Universe is suggestions boggling. Its humorous which you will decide all those people by ability of making some straight forward statements that should quite be made approximately you considering you have no longer have been given any ideals or faith in something, yet your self.

Answer 8

I'd come up with more to say, but you completely lost credibiltiy once you claimed the KJV is 100% true and never found in error.

Answer 9

what are you talking about? The Catholics wrote the bible.... so there word on it is the true word. and ofcording to the bible jesus had a church.... that church became catholicism, and they still practice all the traditions Jesus himself started. and if the King James is so accurate why is there so many different protestant and baptist groups in the world?

and theres enough evidence to say that the Doomsday phrophecies is a fake to. So disproving phrophocies dosnt invalidate a religeon, or it just invalidated any religeon you havent bashed yet (thats christian) whos to say Buddha and Mohhamad havent rissen yet? They could have been killed off, or worse. and so could Jesus have been.

Answer 10

"The KJV is 100% true noone ever found error."

Umm...hate to break the news to ya bud, but if your still waiting on that Jesus guy to come back, he told his followers that one that lived among them, that had seen him during his life, would live to witness his return. A friend of mine was a little boy when his dad "went out for some cigarretes" one afternoon--it didn't take him 2000 years to figure out that daddy wasn't coming back!

I'm not even going to mention Elvis......

Answer 11

While your question is a universal one, it could have been worded a little better. As Christians, we are members of the most radical religion on the planet. Even though we believe it to be true, to every other religion Christianity looks like heresy. If we attack them out of the blue, it only drives them away. God bless you.