I keep seeing libs claim that larry craig "pled guilty", and is not trying to change his story.
That is half true. He pled guilty to disorderly conduct, not anything sexual.
I don't put it past a congressman to be a sexual deviant, but I also don't put it past a cop to take a bribe to set up a politician. Isn't it strange that a newspaper was accusing him of this same activity when this took place?
He pled guilty to disorderly conduct, which could be arguing with the cop. There was obviously not enough evidence to support the cops claims (which may be true).
If it were up to me, I would throw him on a lie detector, and if he is lying, kick him out of office, and if the cop is lying, throw his butt in jail, along with whoever put him up to it.
But the bottom line is, only two people know what happened that day. So libs, get over it. It's over, and it's not the case of the century.
2007-08-29
11:47:38
·
4 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Other - Politics & Government