it seems like half of what they believe in would have negative effect on the economy:
-"state-run" environmentalism, the kyoto protocol would have done more damage than jimmy carter, and who knows what else they'll propose with a democrat president. we'll probably have to quit eating bread or some stupid sh*t. maybe we'll have to eat sh*t.
-higher taxes, discouraging investment, foreign and domestic. only the rich of the rich will invest, everyone else will look elsewhere to make money.
-state regulation of industries, its a proven fact that regulating the hell out of a business is inefficient, which is why even China is steadily deregulating.
-gas taxes(from edwards), at a time when gas prices are already high.
the iraq war would have no significant effect on the economy compared to what I listed above, and cutting and running wont fix anything overnight. even now, mortgage problems are causing more damage than the war. free trade sustains our 4.5% unemployment.
2007-08-22
01:16:48
·
13 answers
·
asked by
blank
1
in
Politics