What is the difference between a peron fighting animals and hunting for one (besides hunting is legal)?

Question

Also, is it good for population when we slaughter animals to make the pigskin footballs?

Answer 1

hunting is a sport and we get food from it

2 animals fighting is not a sport most people don't eat dogs


we need the footballs

Answer 2

Hunting is good for the population. It culls animals out so they don't over populate especially in areas with limited resources. Although I don't hunt and don't like the idea of hunting it is necessary. Also the animals are often eaten by the hunter's family or the meat is donated to a food pantry.

Dog fighting, rooster fighting, bull baiting, boar baiting, etc on the other hand is a brutal spectacle that is only for the entertainment of the people involved. Animals are killed and maimed for no other reason than for the amusement of these cretins. In the case of dog fighting pet dogs are often stolen and used to "test" these dogs to see if they have the blood lust. It is disgusting.

Answer 3

You must be all worked up about that football player that got aressted for dog fighting.I hope they make an example out of him and goes to jail and never sets foot on a football field again.But they wont he will probly get a hefty fine and will be on probation or somthing.Anyway when you go hunting you hunt wild animals and after there dead you eat them.When people fight dogs there is gambleing involved plus people have dogs as pets so alot of people are sensitive about it.

Answer 4

Vick wasn't "fighting animals", he was putting animals in pits to fight each other, and as a Virginia Tech fan who cheered for Vick I am disgusted that my homie would go out like that.
It takes a sick disgusting coward to sit in rows of seats where they are protected from the dogs and watch dogs rip each other apart like that. Hunters eat what they kill. Do you and Vick eat dogs?
Real men go in the woods with wild animals capable of killing them if they make a mistake and come home with meat for their families. Go face down a bear or a mountain lion in the woods and then tell me hunting is the same as arranging dog fights. Man enough to hunt ? I doubt it...

Answer 5

People that fight animals - whether they are dogs, birds or any other - usually end up having the animal torn apart, in excruciating pain and bleeding. This is absolutely cruel. If the animal is not a total loss, then they stitch it up using no anesthetic and send it back into the ring. If the animal is a total loss, they usually shoot it in the head (dogs) or break its neck (birds) to "end its suffering".

With hunting, most do it for food, not sport. They do not let their kill lie around in pain if it is not a clean shot.

At least, this is my take on it.

Answer 6

I am assuming this question is directed at the vic thing, I cant really tell because it seems like english is your second language.

1- Hunting animals will ensure you dont lose your $128 million football contract.

2- Hunting is far more humane than having animals ripped apart for your viewing pleasure.

3- Hunting is for people with brains versus animals who should be in the ring snarling and biting instead of their dogs.

4- Unless you are very stupid, hunting wont end your career and land you in federal prison with no chance of ever working in your industry again.

I guess he found the one thing his fans wont support him through....So sad.

Answer 7

Animals fighting is all about $$$$$$$$$$$ and the sick, perverted people who are involved in it as spectators, breeders or bet on the outcome of the fight*...............Hunting is the just the opposite*...

Answer 8

Hunting is natural (we are predators by natures design after all), legal and helps maintain balance in the natural world.

Fighting animals (dogs, cocks etc...) is unnatural, just plain cruel and illegal. Additionally it serves no legitimate purpose.

Answer 9

I live in Montana, I hunt for food, believe it or not we really enjoy eating deer, elk, and antelope.