"Revolutions come in many forms, and revolutionaries fail in different ways. Hillary is a revolutionary - though of a type that is not easily recognized by most Americans. She is a 'soft' revolutionary - or 'establishment' radical - of the kind that thrives today in the social democracies of Western Europe and Scandanavia, and it is safe to say that if Hillary could have her way, she would establish here exactly the sort of cradle-to-grave nanny state that exists in Denmark and Sweden." - Page 413 of 'The Seduction of Hillary Rodham' by David Brock, pub. 1996. Does anyone out there doubt that Hillary has a long history of wanting big government to take over our lives? Your thoughts, please ???
2007-08-06
09:22:32
·
9 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Elections