I've heard the argument that their profession is so highly technical that only a fellow lawyer could understand it, but surgeons who preform live donor organ transplants which are also highly technical are licensed through the state the operated in, so I reject that argument, as well as the argument that the public doesn't understand that criminals need a defense and that people would seek to revoke the license of a lawyer that defended a particularly reprehensible criminal, this might have been the case years ago but after so many Grishom movies and novels and so many lawyer shows on tv I don't believe that argument either, so what is left?
2006-06-11
05:08:01
·
5 answers
·
asked by
miknave
4
in
Law & Ethics