I say NO. I think its ridiculous that these teams go on average 4 weeks between their last scheduled game and their bowl game, and yet people point to the bowl records as a legit way to judge a conference. I know that some will say its the only way to judge, but honestly Ive seen numerous bowl games where a team lost due to either layoff, or indeference (not to mention certain conferences have gerrymadered bowl mathcups; IE Pac-10 matching their 3rd against another conferences 5th). I think its silly to base a conference rank on bowl winning. Agree or disagree?
2007-08-29
17:17:54
·
6 answers
·
asked by
D Money
2