Religion & Spirituality - 23 September 2007

could mankind be doing better

2007-09-23 04:49:15 · 6 answers · asked by gasp 4

my brothers question... his reasoning being, he won't tell me....

2007-09-23 04:47:43 · 41 answers · asked by Verity 1

2007-09-23 04:46:00 · 25 answers · asked by Anonymous

"All non-Christians are disciples of Satan" ....
Damn! Are there actually people who think this way !?

2007-09-23 04:44:38 · 30 answers · asked by larissa 6

2007-09-23 04:44:00 · 32 answers · asked by Anonymous

in job 26:7 it says He suspend the earth in nothingness how could man have known tha over 2000 years ago that there is nothing in space if god didnt tell them

2007-09-23 04:42:01 · 29 answers · asked by The Doctor 3

2007-09-23 04:41:43 · 8 answers · asked by Larkin O 1

... an atheist many years ago, I realized after some time that I am "truly" agnostic. Now, I have recently learned more about ignosticism and believe myself to be classified more precisely as this. It's not that I am going around looking for labels for myself for arbitrary reasons but rather that I enjoy religious debate and would like to concisely state my position as efficiently as possible.

Anyone else consider themselves ignostic?

2007-09-23 04:41:25 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-09-23 04:41:09 · 22 answers · asked by Mithrianity 3

2007-09-23 04:41:04 · 6 answers · asked by jamoca 7

Anywhere in India is VAMANA-dvadasi celebrated traditionally at present time? or this ancient Vedic festival artificially revitalized by devotees of ISCKON?

Where and how?please

2007-09-23 04:38:57 · 3 answers · asked by Govrisha 2

that the negative scriptures are to let you know what their end will be and you should not bash them but have compassion on them

2007-09-23 04:36:34 · 3 answers · asked by sego lily 7

I have to give credit for this question to Kid Rock, who asks it on a new tape he has issued. He stated in a magazine interview that no one has had the courage to ask this question. Well, he's right, so I will ask it. With horror tales of priests abusing children, with the church authorities covering it up, sending the abuser on to work with other children, should I be afraid? With the Evangelical Christians turning children into radical soldiers, mixing religion with politics in a way that is aggressive and brutal, should I be afraid? With all of this going on, these secret agendas, the payoffs, the abuse, the radical religious politics, should I send my innocent child to church at all, or would it be better to teach him the lessons Jesus left us at home, where he is safe from harm?

2007-09-23 04:34:57 · 35 answers · asked by Me, Too 6

Christianity needs to be redefined??

2007-09-23 04:34:43 · 21 answers · asked by I give you the Glory Father ! 6

Isn't the Creator dependent on Creation and therefore inseparable and one in the same with that Creation?

2007-09-23 04:34:38 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous

He's possibly the most shady political figure with the most power and influence on the world i've ever heard of. He hardly ever knows what he's talking about and couldnt' answer a question properly if his life depended on it. Also, he's part of that skulls and bones secret society... like that isn't at all suspicious.

I'd also love to know why Christians are supporting this war. It's killed hundreds of thousands of innocent people and Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11 WHICH SHOULD BE OBVIOUS BY NOW, if it isn't then... this world has more problems than it's even aware of.

Also, shouldn't the American economy be going UP from all the oil money they are rollin in?

Just because he claims to be a Christian, doesn't actually make him a Christian.

"Bush is just a puppet taking orders on his cell phone"

2007-09-23 04:34:24 · 23 answers · asked by NoneOfYourBusiness 1

Matthew 5:43-45 (King James Version)


43Ye have heard that it hath been said, Thou shalt love thy neighbour, and hate thine enemy.

44But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you;

45That ye may be the children of your Father which is in heaven: for he maketh his sun to rise on the evil and on the good, and sendeth rain on the just and on the unjust.

2007-09-23 04:32:05 · 3 answers · asked by sego lily 7

(or, of course, gods)... is that something akin to the notion that objectivity is key to the issue. The most common argument I've seen put forth by agnostics and atheists, for example, is that there exists no empirical evidence of such a being.

Abrahamic theists - in particular Christians - on the other hand cite personal examples of such a being touching their lives. Such claims are sometimes attributed to lunacy by some in the first group. Even the labeling of something as "lunacy," though, necessarily imposes cultural norms on the classification - something that would presumably be looked down upon by objectivists.

My question is this: For those that reject the existence of a personal God on the basis of a lack of empirical evidence, why is your approach to this issue superior?

2007-09-23 04:31:23 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

What if we just all slept with someone of a different faith or belief than our own. Maybe even make some babies and bring them into the world. Wouldn't that be great? We could knock down all the walls of intolerance, injustice and wars that are being fought in the name of religion.

Our slogan, "Take The One You Hate and Lay With Them Today!"

2007-09-23 04:30:36 · 11 answers · asked by Ask Donna 3

2007-09-23 04:26:35 · 28 answers · asked by gasp 4

?

2007-09-23 04:25:00 · 23 answers · asked by ? 2

2007-09-23 04:24:28 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

I love my friends and some of my family. But I know them, see them and interact with them.
I don't understand the concept of how one can love God because there is no interaction there. And when I say interaction I am speaking of fond memories, long chats or just hanging out.
Bottom line is don't you need to know someone before you love them?
Or is it the "idea" of God you love.
Please explain.
Thanks

And by the way please don't tell me the love is automatic as a child loves his/her mother. I myself don't love my mother as I don't know her. She gave birth to me, stuck around for a while and decided she had better things to do. When my dad remarried I "learned" to love my stepmom. I love her dearly, love her like a mother, but it wasn't automatic...I had to get to know her.

2007-09-23 04:24:08 · 25 answers · asked by Anonymous

Would you still be their friend?
Would you still spew your "anti-god" , evolutionist dogma?
Would you invite them to one of your parties?

2007-09-23 04:21:48 · 16 answers · asked by Diver Down 3

this really only for people who know what they are talking about, particularly people who are of this religion. can u give me questions about the religion and answer them. that sounds kinda weird, but i have to do this for humanities class, and i hav e to have 4 questions and answer them myself..i don't want to misquote on anyone's beliefs, so please help mee!

2007-09-23 04:18:47 · 6 answers · asked by jitwitit 2

Paul's claim, in Galatians, that Peter supported the Pauline interpretation of Christianity is vigorously opposed: Paul is "the man who is my [Peter's] enemy" and anyone who suggests that Peter believed the "dissolution of the law" distorts the truth of God. Writing in the persona of Peter, the author attacks Paul's experience of the Risen Christ and his claims to visionary experience. "Truth" the author insists is one and unchanged from the beginning. Pauline Christianity depends on the false teaching of a dangerous innovator.

from the Kerygmata Petrou :

http://www.etss.edu/hts/hts1/info1.htm

2007-09-23 04:16:02 · 7 answers · asked by Mithrianity 3

Yes?

2007-09-23 04:14:50 · 26 answers · asked by ? 2

What Spiritual Food.... did YOU... Eat Today ?

(1Peter 2:2-3) desire the sincere milk of the Word, as newborn babes, so that you may grow by it;

(1Pet 2:3) if truly you have tasted that the Lord is gracious.

AND...

(2Corinthians 4:16) For this cause we do not faint; but though our outward man perishes, yet the inward man is being renewed day by day.

AND...

(Hebrews 5:11-to-14) of whom we have much to say, and hard to be explained since you are dull of hearing.

(Heb 5:12) For indeed because of the time, you ought to be teachers, you have need that one teach you again what are the first principles of the oracles of God. And you have become in need of milk, and not of solid food.

(Heb 5:13) For everyone partaking of milk is unskillful in the Word of Righteousness, for he is an infant.

(Heb 5:14) But solid food belongs to those who are of full age, even those who because of use have their senses exercised to discern both good and evil.

Thanks, RR

2007-09-23 04:13:14 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous

how little do you really know

2007-09-23 04:11:50 · 13 answers · asked by gasp 4

In America the evangelical christians can be pretty damn hardline about things, often expressing Christianity in wrong light...
Does this cause extremism (strong dislike) against them, as 'extremists' themselves.... is this not causing an out break of general extremism in every direction...
... Does this question even make any sense?!?

2007-09-23 04:08:55 · 13 answers · asked by Verity 1