Religion & Spirituality - 13 September 2007

Where was all of this anger before?

2007-09-13 13:32:02 · 12 answers · asked by beeze 4

Yeshua taught in parables, what is the moral or point of this one?

2007-09-13 13:30:22 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-09-13 13:28:21 · 18 answers · asked by Hot Coco Puff 7

According to their interpretation, Jesus is a lesser god.
If there is one true god, is Jesus a true god or a false god?

If he is a true god then there are two true gods, Jehovah (the Father) and Jesus (the son)

if he is a false god then I don't need to believe in him.

or are they both true God?

thanks.

2007-09-13 13:27:24 · 13 answers · asked by Gruntled Employee 6

Praise God!

2007-09-13 13:26:56 · 18 answers · asked by Prof Fruitcake 6

Things we can't see, but can still BELIEVE in...

2007-09-13 13:25:48 · 8 answers · asked by Hot Coco Puff 7

~~Friedrich Nietzsche

2007-09-13 13:20:11 · 4 answers · asked by Hot Coco Puff 7

which one is correct???

2007-09-13 13:20:10 · 2 answers · asked by emily 1

Can they drink alcohol and smoke cigeretes?

2007-09-13 13:16:47 · 18 answers · asked by ST 4

2007-09-13 13:16:09 · 21 answers · asked by Linz ♥ VT 4

From a former question (for evolutionists), I've learned that according to the evolution theory, humans and apes evolved from a common ancestor.

From the same question I was also wondering what humans would change into (if anything). They said they didn't know, but humans are getting a tiny bit taller over the centuries. If evolutionists think this, they believe (or at least I assume because this is obvious) that the slight change could not be noticable in one or even two generations.

Assuming this, the change from the common ancestor would be unnoticeable in one generation. The two seperations (not knowing they were seperating because of a unnoticeable change) would either reproduce together, which would continue the common species (which in my own mind is humans alone), or they wouldn't reproduce, and the chain would die out.

If you do not understand what I am saying, please correct me. Could you explain this?

2007-09-13 13:15:34 · 19 answers · asked by siteoftupac 1

2007-09-13 13:14:58 · 34 answers · asked by Page 4

There are people getting medical help because they say god speaks to them,do you think some of the people in the bible could be liars,mistaken or just ill?

2007-09-13 13:14:57 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-09-13 13:12:30 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

The Epoch Times, which reported the above fact, also revealed that a human rights group in Vienna, Austria is demanding that gorillas be given the same rights as humans, except the right to vote.
Let's send telegrams to Vienna supporting this noble and fair cause!

2007-09-13 13:11:59 · 24 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-09-13 13:11:47 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-09-13 13:07:09 · 7 answers · asked by - 3

2007-09-13 13:05:46 · 61 answers · asked by Kidd! 6

just wondering :)
and fellow atheists, feel free to answer.

2007-09-13 13:04:03 · 14 answers · asked by :) 4

How many Christians believe God is wanting to work miracles again, like he did when Jesus walked the earth?So many Christians have stopped believing in miracles cuz it seems we never see them anymore, but I really feel in my spirit that God is wanting and will be showing himself again through awesome miracles, I am believing in the miracle of getting pregnant when the Dr say I can't, I believe it will happen. What miracle are you believeing in for yourself?

2007-09-13 13:03:38 · 31 answers · asked by simple serenity 3

I don't have any statistics to prove my point, but if say a study came out tomorrow that said if gay marriage were allowed there would be more homes for which children could be adopted, would you still be against it?
I tie this in with abortion because people who are prolife usually give adoption as an aternative to abortion, yet I have a feeling many of them don't adopt at all.
So, would you be for gay marriage if it provided more homes for yet to be adopted/orphan children?

2007-09-13 13:03:09 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

Given this:
Roman Catholic scholar Joseph F. Kelly wrote in The Concise Dictionary of Early Christianity (1992, p. 2), "The word 'pope' was not used exclusively of the bishop of Rome until the ninth century, and it is likely that in the earliest Roman community a college of presbyters rather than a single bishop provided the leadership."

Doesn't the Roman Church's assertion that the supremecy of the bishop(singular) of Rome goes back to the Apostle Peter seem a little odd to you? I mean, either there was always only one, or there wasn't right?

2007-09-13 12:59:09 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous

in regards to my previous question about Atheists
Truth Seeker says

"Someone who intellecually arrives at atheism, stays there. For example, most people claim they understand evolution, but few people really do. If you can go into detail about evolution, and understand exactly how hominds arouse from environmental changes, then you understand evolution and, consequently, soon discrad any silly notions of creationism or "in God's Image".

I disagree but can I have your thoughts on this please ?

( sorry Truth for using your answer but I am curious about this now )

2007-09-13 12:58:51 · 25 answers · asked by Anonymous

"Do not give dogs what is sacred; do not throw your pearls to pigs. If you do, they may trample them under their feet, and then turn and tear you to pieces."

2007-09-13 12:58:07 · 30 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-09-13 12:56:51 · 15 answers · asked by lindsey p 5

why do you beleive in him?

because my point is that how can you believe the bible when it was wrote years and years ago. who by? and how do u kno its all accurate?

if there was adam and eve.. where did we get white black and brown people from?

if there is a god why do horrible things happen to nice people?

where was god when I nearly died in a serioys attack when I was 10 years old?

also why do you pray or believe in some thing you have never heard or seen?

2007-09-13 12:55:53 · 18 answers · asked by Jenna P 1

Be interested in joining this forum?

http://philosophytalk.freeforums.org/index.php

2007-09-13 12:55:36 · 3 answers · asked by valkyrie hero 4

What do they think Jean-Baptiste Lamarck and Erasmus Darwin were talking and writing about before Charles Darwin was even born? Chambers, Grant, Jameson, and many others were debating and publishing works on evolution decades before Charles Darwin did.

Is it just that they are bitter because he enlighteed the world to an observable mechanism behind evolution (natural selection)?

2007-09-13 12:54:19 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

they are outsmarted, all they do is to be sarcastic? Not intelligent hmmmmmmmmm.

2007-09-13 12:53:44 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous

Adam was standing right there with her. Eve didn't shake her hips, toss her hair and say "I've got something here for you big boy". Adam was standing right there and ate it with her. Why is all of the blame placed only on Eve?



5 for God doth know that in the day ye eat thereof, then your eyes shall be opened, and ye shall be as gods, knowing good and evil.

6 And when the woman saw that the tree was good for food, and that it was pleasant to the eyes, and a tree to be desired to make one wise, she took of the fruit thereof, and did eat, and gave also unto her husband with her; and he did eat.

2007-09-13 12:53:02 · 18 answers · asked by Gawdless Heathen 6