From some debates I've had with Atheist's and most questions I've seen on here, the Atheist argument seems to be "There is no evidence of anything past death, so there must be nothing past death." (btw, i'm Atheist in that I don't believe in god but I do believe in an afterlife and most Atheist's tend to not believe in both) I find a few things wrong with this argument against an afterlife,
1. the only thing you're really saying is that your body dies so you must die too, so you're also saying all of our feelings die too? I wasn't aware feelings could die, you can stop feeling something sure, but the ability to feel it again is never lost but if you lose an arm, you can't get a new real arm to replace it, you can only get a fake arm, like when you dream, all you're doing is feeling something and it's not your body you're feeling, you don't need to eat/ drink/ rest in dreams and your body is barely moving, unless you toss in your sleep.
2007-01-25
19:29:52
·
21 answers
·
asked by
David H
3