Here are the principal arguments:
1) Total lack of historical evidence that he ever existed.
Fundamentalist apologists cite a lot-- ALL of it bad
and easily refuted by a competent scholar.
2) The close resemblance of the Jesus story to the essential
outline of the Mystery Cults: god-men, born of virgins on
December 25th, who die on a tree and rise from the dead,
giving immortality to their devoted disciples. Plus a
sacramental meal of bread & wine. Plus ritual baptism,
even being literally "washed in the blood".
3) The convoluted distortion of Old Testament passages use
as "prrof texts", and the indication that a lot of the details of
the story were borrowed from the OT and inserted into the
text of the NT.
In all, it's highly fishy. There is no reason to conclude that Jesus ever existed. Only wishful thinking. But all the wishful thinking in the world cannot make delusion real.
2007-12-27
05:45:19
·
40 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Religion & Spirituality