Do you think it is wrong to kill animals for fun, for target practice, or for "food" that is likely to be wasted? That is, if you throw away chicken that has "gone bad," or give meat to a toddler who throws it all over the floor and demands mac and cheese or cookies, do you feel worse about this than you would about meat that you actually eat?
In the (decades-old) book I am currently reading, In Cold Blood, Truman Capote describes various people involved in killing, and in capturing the killers of, a Midwestern family. Seemingly in an attempt to portray one of the killers as generally heartless (in addition, of course, to his crime), Capote mentions that the guy often intentionally runs over dogs, actually swerving so as to be sure to hit them. However, one of the other figures in the case, a detective portrayed to be dedicated and good-hearted, is described as shooting crows for target practice and relaxation. Is there a moral difference beween these two actions in your mind?
2007-12-18
07:07:15
·
14 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Psychology