Physics - July 2006

if answers to the question is 4 degree c ,then what is the reason

2006-07-16 22:40:50 · 6 answers · asked by raseem_ar 1

how did scientists determine the speed of light accurately ?

2006-07-16 22:21:35 · 19 answers · asked by joe 1

general solutions

2006-07-16 22:14:58 · 3 answers · asked by cham 1

2006-07-16 21:41:09 · 5 answers · asked by Harshindu K 1

2006-07-16 19:44:48 · 17 answers · asked by raseem_ar 1

2006-07-16 19:18:38 · 5 answers · asked by Name 2

We know that water is composed of hydrogen and oxegyn. And I heard that both hydrogen and oxygen can be used as fuel. I'm not so sure about it. And, if it's true, I want to know if there are people doing it. If I may get in touch with them, I want to know from them how they do it.

2006-07-16 19:00:02 · 7 answers · asked by vegatech 1

I'd really like to hear a good, science-based explanation for this. I can't figure it out. I have been able to explain away several of the conspiracy crowd's arguments, but the absence of blast craters beneath the LM's is a tough one. I've examined tons of photos, but they are all pretty much the same. There isn't even any dust on the LM footpads that should have settled back down after landing. This is really bizarre.

If you have the answer, or even just a theory, please let me know.

Thanks folks!

2006-07-16 18:55:46 · 8 answers · asked by newhebrew1964 3

2006-07-16 18:30:25 · 8 answers · asked by kazs 1

Consider a very large wooden barrel, such as the kinds used in wineries. Should the “flat” ends be concave or convex? Why?

2006-07-16 18:14:18 · 5 answers · asked by a_distorted_realitys_big_nothing 1

Can someone explain to me the theory of "entangled particles"?

How can a particle here affect another paired particle on the other side of the universe instantaneously?

It sounds too fantastic to be true, but I know there's been experimental proof of this.

I've read and re-read this theory but too stupid to understand it.

2006-07-16 17:40:10 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous

If humas where born under water what quantium physics would advance and why? Would we be more advaced now then would we be in the past..

2006-07-16 17:06:11 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous

Recent experiments have shown that the velocity of light can be increased and decreased. What if c is a function of the rate of expansion of the universe? Any thoughts?

2006-07-16 16:47:28 · 11 answers · asked by williamh772 5

...tom science

2006-07-16 15:12:42 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-07-16 15:01:55 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

What reason is given for the diferent rates? Does the oscillation attenuate? If not, where does the energy come from to sustain the oscillation?

2006-07-16 14:22:23 · 6 answers · asked by syrious 5

2006-07-16 13:46:57 · 12 answers · asked by Gardenfoot 4

Wow, only now, after four attempts, do I really understand how hard this question is to answer.

Most of your answers have been very informative and I thank you all for enlightening me with the information that you have.

However I feel the question here is the failing and I will attemp to express it differently.

Here goes ..... If I am 6 feet tall and I stand infront of a six foot high wall, then moving backwards to lets' say 1 mile away.

Firstly, my height remains at six foot, the wall remains at six foot.

Why then does the wall appear to be a fraction of it's true size?

Why does it not remain as large as it previously appeared in my field of view?

This is not a question about the angles or otherwise of our visual capabilities as humans, this is a fundemental question about why objects seem smaller the further their distance?!

I am finding it hard to believe that no-one understands my question.

Strip away everything you have ever learned and then answer

2006-07-16 13:37:34 · 16 answers · asked by THINKER 2

2006-07-16 12:44:33 · 6 answers · asked by joe 1

2006-07-16 12:31:17 · 10 answers · asked by kp.eric 2

2006-07-16 12:30:34 · 9 answers · asked by kp.eric 2

2006-07-16 12:21:41 · 4 answers · asked by Big Bob 1

2006-07-16 12:05:51 · 14 answers · asked by elhlaby02 2

2006-07-16 12:01:12 · 13 answers · asked by Ronny 1

2006-07-16 12:00:58 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

Number of elements?
Unknown "A"
We do have knowledge of elements that exist here and now. How many others existed originally, still exist in othere regions, or existed for short periods of time?
Unknown "B"

The Atomic mass of the universe?
Unknown "C"
It is estimated at 4*10-79th power.
What % of all original atomic mass was grouped together at the beginning?
Unknown "E"

Assumming only mankind existed to simplify the equation, what are the odds of 7*10-27th power atoms joined together to form a man?
Unknown "F"
"F*2"= man and woman

Odds of their being on a stable planet that will sustain them?
Atmosphere: Unknown "G"
Water: Unknown "H"
Continuous food source: Unknown "I"

I will say that water will be a given. Its value is 1.

Why is it so damn hard for the evolutionist side to say:
"I DO NOT KNOW'?

NO ONE, repeat NO ONE can give an honest answer with SO many unknowns!

I don't have to be a theist to see that this is silly.
After a certain point, the answer is 0 or impossible.

2006-07-16 11:47:36 · 5 answers · asked by athorgarak 4

2006-07-16 11:00:20 · 2 answers · asked by goring 6

We might wonder what we are observing with a casual glance at a wristwatch. Sure, a clock tells time. What does time really tell? Time as no direct measure. How would you really explain time?

2006-07-16 10:58:46 · 9 answers · asked by ZORRO 3

note =Euler function (1+2+3+....)/2 =mimus 1/12

2006-07-16 09:24:24 · 2 answers · asked by goring 6

Is it possible that a physical universe (or all universes -in the case that there are parallel universes) exists only to complete the temporal evolution of all possible states in the specified universe when the rules of evolution (laws of physics) are subject to the constraints imposed by Goedel's Incompletenes Theorems?? (Ignore the paradoxes found by G. Cantor in developing Set Theory.)

2006-07-16 09:21:17 · 3 answers · asked by inquisitive_ai 1