2006-07-16 13:46:57 · 12 answers · asked by Gardenfoot 4 in Science & Mathematics ➔ Physics
I'M GOING TO ATTEMPT TO CLEAR UP SEVERAL MISCONCEPTION WITH BLACK HOLES AND SUCH.
1) IT DOES NOT TAKE "GOBS" OF MASS, THERE ARE ACTUALLY THEORETICAL MICROSCOPIC BLACK HOLES.
2) THE PARTICLE ANTIPARTICLE PAIRS WHICH GIVES RISE TO HAWKING RADIATION DO NOT ONLY OCCUR AT A BLACK HOLES EVENT HORIZON BUT MAY ALSO OCCUR IN YOUR BEDROOM, ANUS, THE SUN, OR EVEN YOUR NEIGHBORS CAR
3) A SINGLE PARTICLE'S REST MASS DOES NOT CHANGE NO MATTER WHAT THE SPEED. IT'S RELATIVISTIC MASS IS THE ONE THAT CHANGES AS A FUNCTION OF SPEED.
MORE TO FOLLOW AS MISTAKES ARE GIVEN AS ANSWERS.
To answer your question, no particle existing or scheduled to be built has the potential to create permanent black holes.
2006-07-16 16:48:19 · answer #1 · answered by Nick N 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not yet. That was a concern when the latest supercollider was started, but it did not occur. The this is the first time that plasma densities not seen in our part of the galaxy were produced.
2006-07-16 22:21:19 · answer #2 · answered by a simple man 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i am not so sure. if particle accelerator is pushing the atoms fast enough in opposite directions and each with 99.99999999999% of the speed of light..... at the instance of the collision, i guess it would absorb a lot of eV and increase mass as fusion occurs. just maybe enough to gain rest mass (like heavy subatomic particles, neutron). then create a distortion in space and high gravitational field. finally, a mini blackhole is created.
2006-07-16 20:59:05 · answer #3 · answered by cool nerd 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes.. Just wait for CErn.. It will be big news.
Black holes are known as the omnivorous destroyers of stars, but in reality, black holes not only take but give.
Near their event horizons, where space is so drastically warped, black holes spawn particle-antiparticle pairs out of sheer vacuum. In some cases, one of the pair escapes beyond the horizon while its counterpart is pulled back into the hole.
Thus black holes can shed energy in the form of this "Hawking radiation."
Physicists hope to bring this whole process down to earth by manufacturing tiny black holes amid the stupendous smashups of protons at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) being built at CERN.
2006-07-16 20:49:17 · answer #4 · answered by questionman 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no the it would have to be in the vacum of space time for the energy to escpae to blow a hole in our space time...thats what a black hole is but in simulation with no magnetic field or gravity a atom smasher
or supercollider that work with out the use of magentics it could
2006-07-16 23:20:46 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not only accidently but on purpose! See this website ==> http://physicsweb.org/articles/news/6/1/15
2006-07-16 20:57:15 · answer #6 · answered by Chug-a-Lug 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't think so. Where would the mass come from? To make a black hole, you would have to be able to compress nuclei by an incredible amount. We couldn't do it, even by accident.
2006-07-16 20:51:49 · answer #7 · answered by rb42redsuns 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No I black hole is created when a very large star collapses in upon itself, creating so much mass that light can not escape.
2006-07-16 20:52:36 · answer #8 · answered by ginaforu5448 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. Need GOBS of mass (matter) to make a black hole. It would take the mass of hundreds of suns to do it.
2006-07-16 21:23:04 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I doubt it. It would take a lot more energy than anything we could do to create a black hole, so hakuna matata.
2006-07-16 20:51:26 · answer #10 · answered by OnTheCoast 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋